this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
922 points (97.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

30537 readers
3828 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee -3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

its still at the end of the day giving pleasure to another. giving the key word: power thing. its the same atmosphere as bootlicker

[–] papertowels@mander.xyz 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If you think going down on someone is only a submissive act you haven't gone down on someone long enough, or teased them enough.

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee -1 points 1 week ago

thats not what i think im explaining the insult

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Being submissive in sex can be expressed in a blowjob, but so can being dominant. Most sexual acts can be either dominant or submissive under the right context. For example a person can forcibly (consensually) throw the other person down, pin them to the floor and start going down on them while not letting them orgasm. Is the person being overpowered and forced to be frustrate by not orgasming the one in power?

Your understanding of mutual respect and love is unhealthy if you compare going down on someone to bootlicking.

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

im comparing an insult to bootlicking. jesus christ you people really feel like arguing over absolutely nothing

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think you are missing the point, which is that "cocksucker" should not be used as an insult because it's homophobic. Even if you personally identify it as a power dynamic insult, it does not change the fact that it is rooted in homophobia and that the OOP most likely used it without any thought as to its meaning and history but rather it just came to him as a viable insult (internalized homophobia)

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee -2 points 1 week ago

i never thought of it as a homophobic insult because plenty of straight bi etc also suck cocks, if ive ever heard cocksucker in a homophobic context ive always heard a certain slur right after it

to me, cocksucker reminds me of a prison dynamic, where its more about the power of making someone suck your cock vs them being just gay for sucking cock

but at the end of the day it dont matter we're all just arguing about an insult homophobic or not i dont think its a good use of our time to continue to argue about its semantics

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

or maybe i'm just gay and i think cocksucker is a funny insult, but no i must be homophobic, clearly that's the only option.

This shits just not that complicated bro, it's language, doesn't matter where an insult came from if it's use is broadly different in modern lexicon. Some fascinating psychoanalysis of random people on the internet.

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you are white, go call a black person a removed in a friendly way (like black people do to eachother sometimes) and see how well that goes. History matters, the origin of a word matters. Sure, maybe in a 100 years the meaning will change, but currently it is still widely recognized as a homophobic slur.

And even if you were gay, that does not make you immune to internelized homophobia. Just like there are plenty of black people who disagree with the usage of the word removed even if spoken by a black person, because it is still rooted in racism.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah but the proportion of intensity also matters. The n word literally dates back to slavery. It makes sense that it would be a pretty offensive racial line to cross. Although i don't think it's fully strict, i think it's just mostly strict, you can find examples outside of it.

There's also the question of a slur being situationally relevant. For example, you could write out the n word in long form, specifically for the act of describing it, in a dictionary for instance. You would struggle to argue that it's a necessarily "racist" usage of the word.

For the same reason i would argue that "cocksucker" isn't necessarily a slur against gay people, for example, if you don't use it for the purposes of specifically slurring a gay person. Which also brings into question whether or not it is even a slur in the first place.

Of course there are also words like faggot for example, which are more directly linked to gay people, and being a slur specifically in that regard, it doesn't have much use outside of that. But even then people do still use it, primarily gay people. Some of us just think it's a funny word. (you can call me a faggot all you want i don't care, i just think you look silly lmao) though i would still explicitly denote the slurred usage of faggot.

And even if you were gay, that does not make you immune to internelized homophobia.

and this would be pretty fundamentally "schizo" like we're talking freudian psychology levels of psycho analysis and diagnosing here. There are certainly select cases where that could theoretically be possible, but i don't see that being worth more than interesting psychological banter. I mean realistically, it's meaningless in 99% of cases. There's going to be another more aggressive tell.

Just like there are plenty of black people who disagree with the usage of the word removed even if spoken by a black person, because it is still rooted in racism.

and you can be against the usage of it, for sure, but i think you'll have a hard time finding black people who police what other black people say. Just as you will in this case.

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I think we need to agree to disagree because I feel like we both said what we had to say. I still think you are missing the point and you still think I'm over analyzing.

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Okay but like, in regular penis-in-vagina sex, the man is (theoretically) giving pleasure to the woman while also doing all the work. Is that still power play? Is pussyfucker the same as cocksucker?

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

pussyfucker isnt an insult ive ever heard but motherfucker is

cocksucker reminds me of the prison mentality of making someone your bitch so thats where im getting the power play from

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Exactly, pussyfucker isn't an insult because traditionally there was nothing wrong with fucking pussy, but calling someone a cocksucker is implying they're either gay or a woman

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

why arent you explaining motherfucker then?

and funny how your mind goes straight to homophobia or misogyny, when there are other interpretations for cocksucker

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

oedipal

and funny how your mind goes straight to homophobia or misogyny, when there are other interpretations for cocksucker

oh you're trolling, good day

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

maybe check what sub youre in next time

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're not just pretending to be retarded.

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee -1 points 1 week ago

why are you calling me slurs? what did i do to deserve this?

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

that's also a fundamentally flawed argument though. Unless you're like actively raping someone, there's nothing inherently wrong with fucking a woman. That's why the implication of cocksucker and motherfucker matter, obviously someone fucks everyones mother, but it's the implication that people who are "motherfuckers" would fuck your mother just to be a problem.

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

there’s nothing inherently wrong with fucking a woman

Yet it isn't an insult for some reason, I wonder why?

motherfucker is literally an insult, but ok.

i mean yeah, pussyfucker if you used as an insult would be quite a weird insult to throw, but it would work i suppose.

Motherfucker is also in the same vein like the other commenter suggested.

[–] Redfox8@mander.xyz 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So, if you were to replace 'cocksucker' with 'towelhead', slut, Yid, or Nig*** would that still just be a power thing?

Not that it actually makes a difference. This 'power thing' you refer to is controlling abuse for self interest. Introducing a predudice is just a way of trying to justify and/or hide the abuse.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

im sorry are we equating cocksucker, and the n word to be on the same level of offensive slur?

[–] Redfox8@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, the discussion was not about whether different words were of equal or differing offensiveness. My discussion is about what saying 'it's a power thing' actually means and how it relates to abusive behaviour.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i suppose that's fair. But it's also an insult. They're not meant to be nice.

[–] Redfox8@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Exactly! Which was my original point that this 'power thing' is about using/tied to abusive/instluting behaviour rather than something separate.

well yeah, it's an insult. That's like looking at a gun, and then being really confused when it's capable of killing somebody.

Insults aren't commonly derived from compliments, they're often derived from offensive terminology, or context. That's arguably the whole point.