this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
22 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
38453 readers
432 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Insane to me with how much competition there is that are just as good along with all the free stuff available. It's not like early YouTube growing an insane amount of content before it started monetizing heavily. OpenAI is one of like a dozen, probably more, generative AI companies that are all close to each other in quality
While I agree with you, ChatGPT is the one that people really know about in the mainstream. It is Normie AI
Also the most accessible - just literally go to a website - don't even have to login if you don't want.
DeepSeek you have to install a fucking chrome extension (good luck doing that at work), or you have to create an account.
OpenAI still following the bigtech trend of "get them hooked for free, then make money"
except that "get em hooked for free" part isnt working, nor is the "then make money" part.
I'm not so certain
Here's a recent reuters report. https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/ghibli-effect-chatgpt-usage-hits-record-after-rollout-viral-feature-2025-04-01/
160 million active users is quite literally worse than many mobile games developed for a tens of, maybe hundreds of thousands of, usd. 160 million active users for 40 billion funding (they have needed more than this, but i cant be assed to go tally their funding) means theyve spent $250 per user, and their costs only grow as people use it. That is not including the massive server time subsidies Azure has provided them. This is not a profitable company and never will be.
"Block Blast" on the google play store has 40 million daily active users, 160 million monthly, and the studio has around 30 people. Its revenue from ads alone is in the tens of millions per month if this case study is accurate. Oai claims their monthly revenue in the hundreds of millions… with operating costs at greater hundreds of millions. oai profit is negative, with no signs of improving without entirely changing their business plan.
There are some that are even more accessible. For example, if you use bing, it is right there at the start
There's inherent self-selection going on by being on Lemmy in the first place. Plenty of people are happy to just take in what the algorithm feeds to them and are unaware of how URLs work; they just click links.