this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
193 points (98.5% liked)

politics

22731 readers
4935 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm happy my in-group has an actual doctor. I love being able to ask her random questions and verifying things I've heard.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

My formerly happy in-group had a former army medic and current RN that fully supported all the crazy Republican COVID bullshit, while actively seeing those "treatments" do absolutely nothing at her job every fucking day.

Not all doctors and nurses are smart just because they graduated. Like with any job that requires a lot of memorization, some people memorize well but can't actually problem solve in the real world beyond it. You'd think a former Army Medic and Trauma RN wouldn't fall for that shit, yet there she is to this day still.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 1 points 21 hours ago

I can never understand how truly intelligent people buy into imaginary concepts.

The other day there was a Jeopardy champ who had won 4 games. One more win, and he would qualify for the Tournament of Champions, and come back to play again, where even the losing prize money was significant.

In his personal anecdote piece, he thanked his lord and savior Jesus Christ, who has done so much for him, THEN he thanked his family. Here's a guy who had demonstrated how intelligent he was by tearing through 4 Jeopardy wins, and yet he was putting an imaginary ancient religious construct ahead of his family.

He went on to lose the 5th game, and his chance at the Tournament. The deer-in-the-headlights look at the end, as he realized that his lord and savior had forsaken him in his hour of need, was priceless.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Obligatory old joke:

Q: What do you call the student who graduated last in their class at med school?

A: "doctor"

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My experience is that nurses are not particularly intelligent or even that well-educated. Which isn't to say that they are less intelligent or less educated than the average person--moreso that they are very much the average person.

Doctors are very hit or miss.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

from what ive gathered, nurses in many areas have a huge shortage, so they waive some certain programs for them to get an RN license asap. so many fall through the cracks, especially in rural and red areas. i think more blue areas have more stringent rules. also the smart ones are doing travelling nursing anyways.

Doctors, is probably harder to tell, probably dont want a passing grade average doctor, over one that top grades and successful clinical experience, or research(if they done that). additionally ones from elitist colleges, like harvard, stanford, yale? etc, produce elitist doctors, and many of them have that attitude, i have heard some employers wont hire some of these graduates either. i remember an article where someone complained about a yale.harvard doctor on yelp about his shady pratices, and he decided to sue the reviewer. some doctors are extremely jaded to thier patients, they ignore thier concerns.