this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
127 points (88.0% liked)

Political Memes

7773 readers
2046 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

In Hillary's defense (ugh) trump is about the only candidate she had a chance to beat

The real problem was the old dnc insisting it should be her, letting her primary campaign fund the dnc, and letting her primary campaign have final say over everything the DNC did during both the primary and general...

She literally staged a hostile takeover of the party funded by billionaires who it turns out we're fine with trump and even preferred him.

So if you zoom out, it wasn't really Hillary's fault. She was a useful idiot to American's oligarchs whether she knew it or not. Billionaires bought her so she'd buy the DNC and make sure we didn't get anyone even close to Obama again

The really really good news is we finally got the DNC out of neoliberals hands.

The fight over the party already happened, and we won.

So it's important to understand this recent history, but under no circumstances blame the current dnc of 2025 for the bullshit Hillary's people pulled the last 30 years

[–] libra00@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Who is 'we', and what exactly did they win? Cause from where I sit Biden and Harris are pretty neoliberal themselves.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Who is ‘we’,

Anyone that's not a Republican or a neoliberal...

Biden and Harris are pretty neoliberal themselves.

What does that have to do with the DNC chair elected about two months ago?

[–] LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Link to news article on the story you're discussing?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago

New dnc chair:

https://democrats.org/news/ken-martin-elected-as-new-dnc-chair-commits-to-build-democratic-party-to-win-to-expand-and-to-last/

Hillary funding the dnc and requiring approval of dnc press releases and actions:

Officials from Hillary’s campaign had taken a look at the DNC’s books. Obama left the party $24 million in debt—$15 million in bank debt and more than $8 million owed to vendors after the 2012 campaign—and had been paying that off very slowly. Obama’s campaign was not scheduled to pay it off until 2016. Hillary for America (the campaign) and the Hillary Victory Fund (its joint fundraising vehicle with the DNC) had taken care of 80 percent of the remaining debt in 2016, about $10 million, and had placed the party on an allowance.

And

The agreement—signed by Amy Dacey, the former CEO of the DNC, and Robby Mook with a copy to Marc Elias—specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff. The DNC also was required to consult with the campaign about all other staffing, budgeting, data, analytics, and mailings.

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774/

But I recommend everyone read the whole thing because it even gets into how the "victory fund" bankrupted state parties leading to Republicans controlling the House today:

Yet the states kept less than half of 1 percent of the $82 million they had amassed from the extravagant fund-raisers Hillary’s campaign was holding, just as Gary had described to me when he and I talked in August. When the Politico story described this arrangement as “essentially … money laundering” for the Clinton campaign, Hillary’s people were outraged at being accused of doing something shady. Bernie’s people were angry for their own reasons, saying this was part of a calculated strategy to throw the nomination to Hillary.

[–] libra00@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

I dunno about the DNC chair, but claiming victory after having gotten rid of one neoliberal candidate to just replace them with another seems premature at a minimum. shrug

[–] its_prolly_fine@sh.itjust.works -4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What? Other than the Bernie bullshit what are you talking about? Also why do you personally dislike her? Truly just curious.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's possible you blocked the other person and didn't see this was already answered, so here's a direct link to my other comment:

https://lemmy.world/post/27978735/16338955

[–] its_prolly_fine@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Thanks for the link. I just didn't scroll enough. Commented before reading further down, apologies. Ick. It seems to be an issue with the DNC. They were left vulnerable to financial influence because they were in debt from Obama. All that funding was needed to get a reasonable human being in office. She probably knew this as his VP and was able to use money to get assistance being the nomination. I still think she would have been far better than trump, she is actually good with money. But god, is that fucking annoying that the political parties are just companies that can be bought. Uggggggh it always just boils down to money. God I wish Bernie had been president. He would have worked to get the rich out of our government. I gotta take a break from this, it's just fucking depressing

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It seems to be an issue with the DNC

And the DNC chair resigned and was immediately rewarded with a spot on Hillary's campaign...

That's the whole problem. The DNC and Hillary's campaign was the same people.

They were left vulnerable to financial influence because they were in debt from Obama.

Obama neglected the DNC because in 08 they worked against him in the primary and abandoned him in the general... Because he didn't name a chair as president after the general, Hillary's people held onto the reigns.

But Obama didn't put the DNC into debt, that DNC choose to play favorites and when their favorite (Hillary) lost they didn't support the candidate.

The DNC went bankrupt betting the house on Hillary.

She probably knew this as his VP and was able to use money to get assistance being the nomination.

Do...

Do you think Hillary was Obama's VP?

But god, is that fucking annoying that the political parties are just companies that can be bought.

As of two months ago the neoliberals have been kicked out of DNC leadership, the new chair used to run Minnesota State Dem party and has a very strong track record.

It's great you're asking questions though, and the silver lining is we already won the fight of the party. Shit was fucked at the dnc for decades, now it isn't.

So whatever you do, don't start working against the current dnc because of what was done more than 2 months ago.

So

Does it make sense why so many Dem voters hate Hillary now?