this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
86 points (98.9% liked)

Slop.

494 readers
400 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChestRockwell@hexbear.net 23 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

"The Ontology of the Photographic Image" and "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction" allow us to distinguish these two forms.

Furthermore, to use a camera effectively requires far more than the slop generator.

However, to give a through line to comrades who do not wish to lose themselves in two great essays: The thing that photography and mechanical reproduction have is a connection to a history -- to a material process of production that eventually returns us to the real world -- even if digital capture of an image involves a translation of that moment of reality into data.

The Gen AI slop machines, however, do not retain a real trace to our world in the way a camera can -- instead, they actively efface that trace back to reality (hence the lack of citation, credit, etc).