this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
344 points (98.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

7533 readers
2323 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 28 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

If war only involves robots and and AI, at least no humans will be killed …right?

Edit; I thought that it was obvious I was being sarcastic.

[–] kubica@fedia.io 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, maybe only some at the beginning, but then there will be no more to kill.

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The machine war will rage eternal

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 9 points 2 weeks ago

Not if we block out the sun. And then wait for the chosen one to make peace with the robots...

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago

Until the ai learns tracking innocent people hostage is a good way to force your opponent into submission. Wars haven't been known to be clean

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Who said anything about only?

[–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 4 points 2 weeks ago

You mean our smarter betters aren’t doing this so humans don’t have to die in their shitty wars?

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

Google "the gospel Gaza "

[–] match@pawb.social 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

every conflict will primarily of AI-driven systems killing civilians, we have yet to have ai versus ai

[–] T156@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

E-War probably comes close, though.