this post was submitted on 16 May 2025
144 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

16575 readers
1245 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/64140227

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

This feels way to close to DNA evidence. Everyone assumed it was foolproof even when it wasn't

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah, no. At least DNA evidence is based on some science where this is "reading minds". Do you seriously compare thee two?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They both have the potential to be trusted yo the point of convicting innocent people

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago

One of them has the potential to prove someones innocence...