Funny

10861 readers

477 users here now

General rules:

Be kind.
All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

kersploosh@sh.itjust.works

example@reddthat.com

VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works

238

And Lo, The Cat Did Hunger (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 months ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/funny@sh.itjust.works

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I would additionally assume ChatGPT would not have access to other LLM databases (for searching). Especially smaller and beta LLM's. For example if someone out there is creating\testing a MedievalGPT app, and posting online its own outputs.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's good to know. Thanks for pointing it out. In this situation, do I need to use multiple AIs or is there some other solution?

[–] VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Current A.I. is all over the place. It's hard which ones to recommend as they evolve and names change. Google(Gemini\Bard) and Microsoft (Copilot) are quite large -- server farm-wise. OpenAI is made in many apps. DeepSeek is in the news lately. There was once a philosophy bot I liked that actually remembered my answer\correction a year and a half later. Do any of these share search results with each other? No clue.

Modern solution... treat it like a search engine... best to use more than one, just make sure.