this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
1139 points (94.3% liked)

Political Memes

8513 readers
2860 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Peaceful protests are more likely to succeed and no peaceful protest that drew in 3.5 percent or more of the population has ever failed.

Source: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20190513-it-only-takes-35-of-people-to-change-the-world

Once you use violence, they will use that to justify using violence and putting down the movement.

You want to win people’s hearts and minds. You do that by being peaceful. Your opponent will make a mistake, but you stay peaceful. Remember MLK Jr.’s successes.

Edit: downvotes, sorry that history and facts don’t support your view of things. But, don’t do violence and damage the movement for the rest of us.

[–] DeusUmbra@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Yes, tell me about the peaceful protests that stopped the Nazis.

[–] GeraldOfHillwood@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

Cool, my rifle has a name now...the peaceful protest.

[–] Philzlaus@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Won't work for dictatorship, that's obvious. But at the moment America is still a few bad decisions away from this. Although Trump is persistently undermining the judiciary.

On the other hand, there is an opposition, and I'm wondering, when do they decide to grow themselves balls? Trump can only do what he wants, because they let him.

[–] DeusUmbra@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

The problem is that you Think there is an opposition, when there is not. The Democrats are not the opposition, they are the collaborators, they merely act as if they are against what is happening while actively ensuring Trump can do whatever he wants. They must also be removed, just like we removed the collaborators in France and other countries after we removed the Nazis. There is a reason why the Dems keep telling us to not fight back, to remain peaceful and to not interfere, to keep playing by their rules. They are paid to be the losing side, the "voice of reason" that does nothing to help the people. The only ones who can stop Trump and the fascists in the government are the people.

“Pacifism is objectively pro-fascist. This is elementary common sense. If you hamper the war effort of one side, you automatically help out that of the other. Nor is there any real way of remaining outside such a war as the present one. In practice, 'he that is not with me is against me'.” ― George Orwell

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 day ago

Peaceful protests are more likely to succeed
more likely to succeed
more likely

Bro doesn't understand the difference between probability & certainty. Pretends a single counterexample refutes a probability.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Once you use violence, they will use that to justify using violence and putting down the movement.

And surely the people who lie about everything wouldn't lie about violence happening anyway to justify using violence...

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Didn’t we hit 3.5% with the 2020 protests in the US?

[–] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes. It was the largest protest movement in US history and it did precisely nothing to stop police brutality.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think it did more than nothing but I wouldn’t consider it a full success. Many police departments reformed their policies and a lot of cops did quiet quitting which meant less policing for a while. But yeah those are small gains I’d say.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If anything it did less than nothing. The police are more militarised than ever.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Well, that was an ongoing process already. I think in the hypothetical where the protests never happened, we'd probably be even further along in that way.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe, but it's an unprovable counterfactual. It's certainly rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah that's true.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

While I do believe in this, a common point brought up about civil rights is everything that Malcolm X and the Black Panthers did around the same time. While peace wins hearts and minds, even just passive shows of force can dissuade hateful pushers of violence.

Even Gandhi didn’t just sit back; his operation broke laws in order to make a point.

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Also tomorrow's protest ain't the one to pop off on. Gotta think tactically