518
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Updating with Gov. Brian Kemp's response:

The 2020 election in Georgia was not stolen.

For nearly three years now, anyone with evidence of fraud has failed to come forward - under oath - and prove anything in a court of law. Our elections in Georgia are secure, accessible, and fair and will continue to be as long as I am governor.

The future of our country is at stake in 2024 and that must be our focus.

https://www.mediaite.com/politics/gov-brian-kemp-absolutely-obliterates-trumps-plan-to-present-irrefutable-report-on-voter-fraud-in-scorching-statement/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

He might be running a little late.

We are still waiting on the report that would fix the US healthcare system within weeks of him entering the White House 6 years ago. I think he also claimed to have a plan for world peace. Probably had something to do with just giving up and handing everything over to Putin, probably. Who knows. We never got that one either.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.one 22 points 1 year ago

Still waiting on that report on Obama's birth certificate for that matter...

[-] some_guy 5 points 1 year ago

Oh, that Futurama ep with the time traveling politician.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

God that shows how long ago it all was. The show has been cancelled and brought back since then.

[-] Schadrach 3 points 1 year ago

The show has been cancelled and brought back since then.

To be fair though given we're talking about Futurama I have to ask which cancellation we're talking about, because it has something like 4 series finales.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Don't forget his brilliant Afghaniplan: withdraw over weeks instead of years and hand the country over to terrorists.

[-] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

And yet somehow our worthless news media had the gall to throw tons of shade on Biden, not Trump, when Biden decided to finally throw in the towel and pull everyone out.

[-] Schadrach 3 points 1 year ago

On the one hand it was an extremely shitty plan concocted by the Trump administration. On the other hand, Biden still followed through with it, knowing it was an extremely shitty plan concocted by the Trump administration.

[-] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

To be fair Biden should have put a halt to it. Everyone knew it was going to be a disaster and he went with it.

[-] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Halt the pull-out? What, so we can be stuck there for another decade? Or dump another trillion dollars into that mess because the first 2 trillion dollars did so much?? Fuck that shit.

[-] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Halt was the wrong word on my part... slow the transition so that it could be done successfully. We definitely needed to get out but doing it on the ill-conceived deadline Trump set was stupid and had horrible consequences for the country and the region.

[-] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

We gave them 2 goddamn decades to stand on their own. What the hell would have another 3 months done? 6 months? 2 years?

[-] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

We don't know. What we do know is the military leaders knew this was going to be a disaster and we'd basically be turning the country back over to the Talaban. What's worse than 15+ years of time, money and lives lost. Knowingly vacating to turn the country over to our enemy, abandoning Afghans that worked with our military risking themselves and their families, all because of an arbitrary deadline set by a useless President that ignored his military advisors.

[-] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

We don’t know.

We don't know?!? Yeah, we do know. How the fuck would another few weeks solved this issue that the previous 1000 weeks (yeah, that's roughly how many weeks we were there already) not done???

Look up "lost sunk fallacy" and shift your position to one that isn't completely idiotic.

[-] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

There are plenty of things we could've done better in our exit to give the country a chance, and we certainly could have done better by the in country allies that we promised help immigrating to the US and then abandoned. That alone has damaged our future conflicts and our ability to encourage locals to help our soldiers on the ground. Our failures and things we should have done different have been discussed plenty by people far more knowledgeable than you and I.

You keep being an angry, absolutist know-it-all though. That's what we love about you!

It's "sunk cost fallacy" btw. Maybe you should look it up.

[-] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Yea, switching two words around is the same as thinking that spending another couple of weeks somewhere where we had already spent 20 goddamn years in would have changed anything.

That right there speaks volumes to how little merit your point has. oooof

[-] Nusm@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

And at the end of his election fraud report, he’s going to announce that he’s going to make Mexico pay to build that wall!

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
518 points (96.1% liked)

politics

18601 readers
4209 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS