this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
822 points (97.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

11542 readers
1908 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 76 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Imagine life was a game. You lived for 2025 years. You worked 260 days / year. You made the median US salary.

You would need to relive that process 3,145 times to match an Oligarch.

That amount of wealth is unethical while humanity suffers. No one can really fathom “1b dollars.”

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 35 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

For reference, Rockefeller was worth $1.4 billion in 1937 dollars on his death. That is the equivalent of $31.36 billion today. The richest person, Elon Musk, is currently worth $400 billion, or nearly 13 Rockefellers.

Nothing humanity has ever seen really compares, unless you're looking at literal kings literally enslaving and literally extracting all value from an entire population, and even then the scale will be far lower given population growth. We are in the oligarch golden age, and if we're lucky and we don't stay here, people will look back at this moment, and not the robber baron era, as the historical comparator for grotesque wealth accumulation.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

This is the era of the Iron Heel.

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Whoah, I'm feeling like I just read words on a page, man. Literature has gotten crazy, man.

That's literally what I wanted you to feel!

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago

It wouldn't be so bad if he actually threw some of that money at good causes. But he doesn't.

If I just multiplied my spending habits to his level I would have probably fully funded several charities. If I can give away money, while still paying off a mortgage and grocery, he definitely can. I have no problem with the ultra wealthy per se it's their selfishness that's the problem.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

WTF is a "Christtime" and why does that chart contradict itself multiple times?

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The length of time between 1/1/1 and today.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

How is that arbitrary date relevant? What about the contradictions?

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

How is that arbitrary date relevant?

I dunno, I just read the first line in the graphic.

What about the contradictions?

You didn't specify contradictions and this isn't my job.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If you're not going to respond to my comments, don't respond to my comments.

Read the lines with that "christ date" or whatever made up bullshit that is.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They're pointing out that if you live for 2,000 odd years you would still have to have several thousand lifespans at that extended life length in order to equal Jeff Bezos.

The reason I was able to work that out was because I read the first fucking sentence.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

My point is that 2,025 years is a very arbitrary length of time, "Christtime" isn't a word, and the chart contradicts itself. You could work that out by reading my comments, and beyond the first fucking sentence.

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not once have you said what the contradictions were, so don't blame others for your inability to express what you mean.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Literally the only two lines that use the term "Christtimes." Try reading the chart.

[–] crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's not an arbitrary date is it? It's when AD started

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but why use that for a length of time one must earn a wage? Nobody's 2,025 years old. How about something like a human lifespan, or something round yet close to that, such as a century?

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like you're volunteering to remake the chart! Rather than complain about someone making it "wrong" in your opinion, you could just, you know, put that same energy towards fixing it yourself.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

God forbid anyone criticize anything.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

In before "well acktually compound interest."