this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
185 points (97.0% liked)
United States | News & Politics
9036 readers
429 users here now
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Kind of seems like he did.
I'm confused, a second ago you said he didn't say that. You said he didn't say burning tearing or grabbing Israeli flag is hate and not speech. Is that not still the case? Because the case was never about incidental contact. If I want to burn and Israeli flag I should be able to because I'm a fucking American and I have the freedom to burn any goddamn flag I want. Especially that of a fascist Nation. So we need to decide what your contention is here. Because if he did not say that I don't know why you're quoting it.
Secondly the idea that the flag was yanked because the woman suing says her flag was grabbed and yanked does that mean it was. That was never proven because the state decided they didn't have enough evidence and dropped it. The fact that the judge doesn't care about truth is not surprising though. Frankly I'm disinclined to believe her.