this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
134 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13974 readers
587 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Please dont make this a fashion struggle session i just wanted people to chuckle with me

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rom@hexbear.net 13 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Wait are there really folks here who disagree with eliminating the gender pocket size disparity?

[–] corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

No i dont think so but idk you never know

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 17 points 8 months ago

Everyone should have large pockets for fitting outdoor cats and stacking stones

[–] sourquincelog@hexbear.net 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

frothingfash if women's pants have real pockets and they put things in their pockets, then I won't be able to awooga their body shape

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 8 points 8 months ago

If women have real pockets then what fucking good would men be, no longer needed to carry keys and phones and shit

[–] Leon_Grotsky@hexbear.net 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I, for one, agree with eliminating the gender pocket size disparity by removing all pockets. What could you possible need pockets for, hoarding grain?

disgost

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why would you need pockets if you don't own private property???? Read theory

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 6 points 8 months ago

might be more likely to be a fight about how caring about fashion at all is bourgeois decadence and brainworms