this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2025
31 points (100.0% liked)

news

24239 readers
745 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 9 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Possibly speed cameras are good because they keep people safe?

Feel free to disagree. I've put zero thought into this.

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

They don't. Realistically everyone knows where they are especially because map apps tell you, so they do whatever speed they want, slam on their brakes right before the cameras, crawl past them at ridiculously low speeds, get out of range, and then just go right back to doing whatever speed they want.

Sure it often slows things down a bit right in the corridor where the cameras are but if it was ever actually about safety, we would be using physics to slow cars down rather than cameras. Even in those corridors usually people are more focused on the camera than the road at that point so if anything its a distraction that makes people drive unsafely.

Red light cameras may be a different story but I doubt it

[–] git@hexbear.net 6 points 8 months ago

so they do whatever speed they want, slam on their brakes right before the cameras, crawl past them at ridiculously low speeds, get out of range, and then just go right back to doing whatever speed they want.

if it was ever actually about safety, we would be using physics to slow cars down rather than cameras

That’s why average speed cameras are now the preferred traffic calming measures on long roads. You can’t avoid ¯v = ∆s / ∆t, you have to stay under a certain speed while you’re between cameras.

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 2 points 8 months ago

Agreed, but think every car should have monitor that just stops you from speeding (with a manual override button for very necessary occasions). Every override is checked by the local government where you did it and your license is taken if you used it without a proper reason. Then speed cameras become unnecessary and we can eliminate like 90% of US cops whose only possible positive impact is causing drivers to be cautious with speed

[–] Carl@hexbear.net 0 points 8 months ago

Fuck that. Speeding is a fake crime invented to criminalize large swathes of the population. They don't even have a scientific process for setting speed limits - they just build a road, see what speed people naturally drive on it, and then set the limit to 80% of that number.

To be clear, "driving dangerously," including going much faster than the surrounding traffic, is and should be a crime, but "speeding" as we currently define it should not.