this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2025
31 points (100.0% liked)

news

24239 readers
745 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 30 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

They have signs on them saying they're weather stations. This "mistaken for speed cameras" shit is bollocks to play down any concern that might arise from the question of why there might be an individual or group intentionally attacking weather stations.

These 3 stations are all at least 3km away from one another too. You have to travel a good distance to intentionally target them and they're not on the same road or anything.

[–] MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. I'd put money on it being either some sort of crank conspiracy or mental health related paranoia or both.

Different part of the country, but when they put up advanced barometers near us to measure wind for potentially building an off shore wind farm, they kept getting vandalised and destroyed. I assumed it was by someone who was against the idea of building the wind farm but a few weeks later all the houses around me started getting photocopied flyers about how they were 5G linked spyware that collected all digital and phone signals in the area to control and blackmail us as part of a test programme that would be rolled out across the UK.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 16 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I wish communists had the energy and motivation to flyer whole areas like conspiracy theorists do damn

[–] stink@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 8 months ago

Sorry pal, best I can do is stickerbomb my laptop with overpriced slop I got on RedBubble

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The UK is absolutely dominated by trotskyism and i've never seen a communist flyer stuck through letterboxes anywhere in the country.

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 2 points 8 months ago

Oh weird in my part of the US trots are always putting up flyers and mailers and shit

[–] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 9 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Possibly speed cameras are good because they keep people safe?

Feel free to disagree. I've put zero thought into this.

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

They don't. Realistically everyone knows where they are especially because map apps tell you, so they do whatever speed they want, slam on their brakes right before the cameras, crawl past them at ridiculously low speeds, get out of range, and then just go right back to doing whatever speed they want.

Sure it often slows things down a bit right in the corridor where the cameras are but if it was ever actually about safety, we would be using physics to slow cars down rather than cameras. Even in those corridors usually people are more focused on the camera than the road at that point so if anything its a distraction that makes people drive unsafely.

Red light cameras may be a different story but I doubt it

[–] git@hexbear.net 6 points 8 months ago

so they do whatever speed they want, slam on their brakes right before the cameras, crawl past them at ridiculously low speeds, get out of range, and then just go right back to doing whatever speed they want.

if it was ever actually about safety, we would be using physics to slow cars down rather than cameras

That’s why average speed cameras are now the preferred traffic calming measures on long roads. You can’t avoid ¯v = ∆s / ∆t, you have to stay under a certain speed while you’re between cameras.

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 2 points 8 months ago

Agreed, but think every car should have monitor that just stops you from speeding (with a manual override button for very necessary occasions). Every override is checked by the local government where you did it and your license is taken if you used it without a proper reason. Then speed cameras become unnecessary and we can eliminate like 90% of US cops whose only possible positive impact is causing drivers to be cautious with speed

[–] Carl@hexbear.net 0 points 8 months ago

Fuck that. Speeding is a fake crime invented to criminalize large swathes of the population. They don't even have a scientific process for setting speed limits - they just build a road, see what speed people naturally drive on it, and then set the limit to 80% of that number.

To be clear, "driving dangerously," including going much faster than the surrounding traffic, is and should be a crime, but "speeding" as we currently define it should not.

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 months ago

Wish they'd posted pics of the roads these were on as well.

If you've ever been to Tow Law then this level of stupidity is hardly surprising