New York Times gift articles

1649 readers

11 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Only post New York Times gift article links.

Info:

The NYT Open Team. (2021-06-23). “A New Way to Share New York Times Stories”. open.nytimes.com.
“Gift Articles for New York Times Subscribers”. (n.d.). help.nytimes.com.

Tip:

Google "unlocked_article_code" and limit search results to the past week.
Mastodon: Use control-F or ⌘-F to search this page. (ref)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

baltakatei@sopuli.xyz

206

Judge Orders That ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ Detention Center Be Shut Down for Now (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 8 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The fuck else you want?! Judges don't get to make laws, take cases at will. They rule on what's in front of them.

[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

oh sorry I was assuming everyone else wanted no concentration camps too thats my bad

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Does no one read the fucking material?! The only item she brought before her was the ecological question. So yeah, that's why she ruled as she did. Judges can't go outside the scope of the case just because they feel like it.

[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

yeah i read it don't interrobang at me like i pissed in your cereal.

it's absurd that apparently the most compelling case to make against the existence of a Concentration Camp is a temporary injunction against new prisoners and construction on ecological grounds until the case can be brought before a supreme court that, i dunno about you, but i dont expect to be terribly sympathetic to the ecological argument quite frankly. and like, yeah the article does specify that they should dismantle the generators and stuff but like, uh... who's enforcing that, exactly? i mean what's stopping them from just, y'know. not complying. again. with another court order. about migrants. another one.

but like yeah for sure they got al capone on the tax evasion thing so sure if it sticks i guess. i'm already holding my breath in anticipation.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Take a step back, BIG breath. All the judge had to work with was the environmental issue, that's what the case challenged. She cannot bring additional challenges.

And YES, enforcement is the next question, and we all know how that will play out.