this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
236 points (99.2% liked)

politics

29789 readers
1865 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Pretty sure the Democrats also had a platform of helping small businesses? Like those still exist.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 7 points 13 hours ago

The Democrats have a platform of saying that want to help small business, in fact they steal from small businesses to give to Big Business, same as the republicans, although a little bit less.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world -2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (3 children)

Yeah that person is speaking emotionally not truthfully. Kamala ran on a first time homebuyer credit to help out the enormous swath of millennials and Gen z that have been priced out of taking part in the economy in a meaningful way, just as a single example that is top of mind. Im sure a quick Google would reveal a bullet list.

[–] bitteroldcoot@piefed.social 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Your rebuttal is nonsensical. She had every opportunity to distinguish herself, and ample resources to get her message across.

SHE FAILED!

We had a vote, and she lost, to a horrific pustule of a human being. There is no greater indictment of her than that. She had a clean shot and she missed completely.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world -3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Rebuttal? The actual fuck are you talking about.

I just stated a fact. I said nothing of her winning, I...

You know what, I'd prefer you don't respond, actually. Go have the life I know you'll have.

Ooh, a block button! ✌️

[–] bitteroldcoot@piefed.social 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Dude, you threw the first turd. Don't play innocent with me.

"Yeah that person is speaking emotionally not truthfully."

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That is what we call a fact, my guy.

Back to the block list forever. 🥂

[–] bitteroldcoot@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago

No, that is called a supposition.

Her loss and her failure are facts.

[–] almost_genocide@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

Plenty of deep blue state governors who could do this if the Democratic party had any intention of solving the cost of living crisis. It's empty promises.

Anyway it's a moot point. Harris was a trash candidate. Registered Democratic voters made it very clear they never wanted her to run in the general election. Not that it was her fault she ended up in that position. Biden was hot garbage and anyone who voted for him in the 2020 primaries is an asshole.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago

Save it for an audience that doesn't know any better. We all know Kamala was a neoliberal hack that was annointed and not even nominated by voters with four plus months to go, for the majority of this country's history the Presidential nominee was not chosen until late August.

But you needed that time to fundraise, how did that workout for you? And you are blaming us? We all knew she couldn't win and you nominated her anyway.