this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
217 points (99.1% liked)

politics

29789 readers
1881 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

"We successfully failed to win. The AIPAC money must keep coming in."

It rhymes and they're slime.

[–] KelvarCherry@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 52 minutes ago

..bb-bUt look at everything but Democrats did win. Donor money, trips to Israel, lobbying dinners, suspiciously-accurate stock market moves... You need to re-shape your mindset and focus on the incremental gains!

[–] some_guy 18 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

TLDR: Because they don't give a fuck about you or me or anyone who isn't a donor.

Repubs want to hurt you. Dems don't care that you exist. We need a third party (as if that's a new idea).

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Quick: who's got Mayor Mamdani on their team? THOSE guys seem to car about people.

[–] KelvarCherry@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 55 minutes ago

the Working Families Party is the best hope USAmericans have. Unlike the Green Party, they're focused on building up their party from the small positions, and proving themselves that way.

[–] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Quick: who’s got Mayor Mamdani on their team? THOSE guys seem to car about people.

The political equivalent of having a black friend just dropped.

[–] MrErr@piefed.world 6 points 5 hours ago

So far the only reason that they would want to keep this a secret is AIPAC.

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Just reading the headline reminded me of how disgusting the amount of money in US politics is. It's probably spreading to other places too.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

Im beginning to think there is a parallel of hyper concentrated wealth to the physics of a fusion detonation.

If it gets too dense, BOOM.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 33 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The Democratic Party isn’t there to “win”, it’s there to act as a honeypot to attract and neutralize progressives, and to make sure that the “Overton Window” of American politics never moves left.

[–] TrollTrollrolllol@lemmy.world 21 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 13 points 8 hours ago

Many Americans are aware of the Ratchet Effect but they’re reluctant to acknowledge that it’s deliberate and coordinated, instead asserting that it’s a function of the “donor class” in the Democratic Party having a different perspective on how political priorities should be assigned.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 16 points 10 hours ago

We all know the reason. It condemns their own shit neoliberal policies and posturing, and they want to continue to pretend that their problem is how they sell the snake oil rather the fact that nobody wants fucking snake oil.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I am at least partially heartened to see the people on here knowing what the fuck is up. I mean six comments deep I agree with everyone, the democratic party is controlled opposition, long since captured by the oligarchy.

Fighting under their Banner, without seizing control of the party, is doomed to fail, and would not produce satisfactory results even if it won.

We could take the party from them. Our policies, our ideas, are actually popular we just lack leadership and organization.

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 10 points 10 hours ago

"Her “signaling” is evidently an effort to disassociate herself from the taint of Martin’s unpopular decision without openly opposing it"

Another principled, very clear, stand from Kamala where she is not trying to please both parties by tying her statements into word salads.

[–] bitteroldcoot@piefed.social 35 points 13 hours ago (9 children)

Why? Because their candidates were a couple of corporate stooges who licked Israel's butthole.

Neither one showed any humanity or concern for the working class.

Meanwhile trump convinced the common man he was on their side and would lower prices. It was all a lie of course. But the democrats couldn't even be bothered to do that.

The whole campaign was "we aren't trump". But offered not solutions at all, just tired platitudes and insincere posturing from a women who had all the empathy of a cold ham.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›