this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
3 points (100.0% liked)
Voyager
8164 readers
27 users here now
The official lemmy community for Voyager, an open source, mobile-first client for lemmy.
Rules
- Be nice.
- lemmy.world instance policy
Sponsor development! π
π
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments





A fair point this is from UK Play store searching for piefed
Yea I get the same.
Often when PieFed is recommended on Reddit, there are comments like "I can't find it on the App-Store?"
For each comment like this, there are probably hundreds of people who went looking, but didn't bother to comment.
Edit: I only now noticed that Blorp does have PieFed in the name. I didn't read that far, I think many users would miss it and click away, starting with 'PieFed...' would be ideal
Blorp dev here. I wanted to emphasize that we have equal support for Lemmy and PieFed. If I put PieFed at the beginning then that would be unfair to Lemmy. And the same goes for the inverse. If I ever get around to adding mbin support, then Iβll really be in trouble lol.
Gee, I don't know if I want to funnel here people that are so lazy as to not be bothered to read the third word in an app name. It does not bode well for their participation in the threadiverse.
So you don't want me on this platform?
Considering you're straw-manning my argument, yes, I don't.
I really hate the gatekeeping I see on the Fediverse, it's one of the few things I don't like about this place.
For how nice everyone is here, and how nice the interactions are, the "Oh please no, don't come here to this place, you are dumb/lazy, and I don't want dumb people here" is gross.
You don't know what's going on in peoples lives, if they have reading disabilities, or if they might speed read or have ADHD.
God forbid they don't thoroughly read through every line in a search result.
It's not closure, but a simple plea for love and kindness.
The Fediverse is based on four pillars:
Honestly, you can't ask app developers to double their work (development, release, store registration, updates, etc.) because users don't read the instructions! π€£
Users have a huge responsibility: to support, test, and fund the volunteer community (1, 2, and 3). If users don't even want to read the instructions, then the Fediverse has no hope of surviving. Those users deserve to be devoured and digested by Big Tech, by profiling logic, and by the predatory attention economy. Amen
Blorp dev here. I agree, but itβs also good to know the pain points. Someone people are correct that a problem exists, but incorrect in their proposed solution.
For example, the are probably ways I can update the App Store listing to make it more obvious that we support PieFed.
You're right, but it's also important not to be subjected to the thousands of requests from the community. I'm a Lemmy administrator, and initially I only allowed communities to be created by request. I can say that many of those who asked me to start a community didn't even bother to follow it... Similarly, users continually ask software and app developers to add unnecessary features that burden developers with commitments and man-hours that rarely yield any benefits.
It's certainly right to evaluate users' needs, but developers have a primary ethical duty to take care of themselves and avoid burnout. Giving developers a nervous breakdown is the easiest way to kill the Fediverse!
Totally fair! I don't know if I've crossed the user threshold yet with Blorp to be overwhelmed by the feedback, so maybe I'll regret my earlier statement. Since Lemmy/PieFed is so privacy focused, I collect 0 analytics data. So that user feedback is kinda the only way to know that people are actually using my app.
I understand Lemmy/PieFed is very anti AI, and honestly for good reason, but I have found it helpful to collect a dump of the comments mentioning "Borp" and then have an LLM categorize what are the top feature requests/bugs. So sometimes that feedback is also helpful indirectly.
I guess my point is, I can't really do anything with no feedback, but I can find ways to comb though a large quantity of feedback.