this post was submitted on 12 May 2026
9 points (100.0% liked)

Crazy Fucking Videos

8819 readers
23 users here now

Dive into the World of Insane Videos!

Rules

  1. No hate speech of any kind.
  2. Content warnings are required in post titles where applicable. Example: [CW: Injury]
  3. Use your best judgement and mark NSFW posts as such.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works -2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The definition of "following too closely" is relatively circular. You have proper following distance if you stop in time to avoid a collision. If you don't avoid a collision, you obviously didn't have enough following distance.
"The cars wouldn't have run into each other if they had been further apart" is basically them saying "driver wasn't dunk or impaired, no sign of mechanical failure, and no evidence they were distracted.
Driving into the back of a school bus is evidence that you at the very least should have been further back, assuming you did everything else by the book.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

I think the video might be evidence of being distracted.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

Yes, technically he was following too closely to account for the fact he was looking at his phone.

If you are looking at your phone you should probably be leaving much more space between you and the vehicle in front due to the fact that your reaction time will be significantly delayed. So technically too close. If he wasn't on the phone it would have been proper following distance.