News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
That’s our struggle currently, they both put a lot of effort and money into demonizing it from the perspective that to do so would weaken whichever “team” you’re on and only benefits the other guys. Preventing it is probably the only thing that has bipartisan support.
We have methods of getting citizen led initiatives on the ballot, typically through collecting signatures of registered voters in favor of the initiative being added to the ballot; reach a certain number, they’re validated, the initiative is put up for a vote that bypasses the legislature. The government is constantly making this process more difficult and often finds any excuse to invalidate or undercut the result. Should it make it onto the ballot and win, in theory implementing the policy should move forward. But for policies the bureaucrats and party members are staunchly opposed it becomes a fight through red tape, feet dragging, court battles, appeals, and sometimes they pretty much say “fuck you, we’re not doing it”. With our courts as corrupt as they are and the legislature having unlimited tax dollars to drag out the battle they can bleed their opponents dry until they make it to the Supreme Court who nowadays mostly rules however the regime sees fit.
In my state, one of the strictest and most severe in the nation about weed, the grassroots initiative to override them and legalize it continues to gain traction and quite possibly will pass in another election or two, so the the legislature has been busy trying to make such measures impossible and have debated rewriting our state constitution before it happens so that even if the majority overwhelmingly votes for it, it’s automatically rejected.
The fact both parties are equally concerned about the prospect give me some clue that it’s a step in breaking the stranglehold the parties have over left or right, conservative or liberal, our guy or their guy, and the the democrat’s default “you’ll vote for our pick because it’s the lesser of two evils”. Progressives are running and winning under the democrat “brand” even as their own party refuses to endorse them, so at least on that side we can see party leadership is losing control of it’s power to maintain the status quo of making sure dogma loyal Dems win primaries and seats.
I think ranked choice would destroy the old school, pro-Israel, Cuck Schumer brand democrat party with more candidates like Mamdani, AOC, and Bernie getting elected. Trumpism is not as popular as his propaganda machine makes it, he’s lost some of his most vocal supporters, and his picks are bootlicking and incompetent. Not that I support a return to Regan/Bush style republicanism, but if the choice wasn’t MAGA or Democrat, I suspect there’s no shortage of conservatives that would use ranked choice to begin to distance themselves from MAGA even if they’ll never admit they fucked up and do it for selfish reasons. Quite possibly all this speculation is too late because I don’t think this regime is going anywhere even if it got a mandate from the masses to leave.