this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
559 points (98.8% liked)

pics

28545 readers
257 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

VW Polo Harlekin

Source CC BY-SA 3.0 Thomas doerfer

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nahostdeutschland@feddit.org 25 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It kind of was peak car:

  • small (3,7 x 1,65m)
  • wasn't that expensive
  • no fancy electronic entertainment systems with subscriptions and problems. Just put in your System of a Down-CD and you're good!
  • Goes up to 150km/h, which is enough speed for everyone
  • Uses between 6 and 7 liters of gas. Which is better than your pickup truck
  • You can drive around with 5 people and transport more stuff than you think.
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 days ago

Uses between 6 and 7 liters of gas. Which is better than your pickup truck

But worse than a modern diesel wagon or even midsize (huge by European standards) crossover SUV like an X5. I guess about the same as a modern petrol wagon like a Passat Variant then? Which can transport way more stuff, fit adults in the back seat and should even be able to tow a medium sized trailer (not a huge motorhome obviously).

We've come a LONG way in efficiency for internal combustion engines. Pickup trucks suck, but outside of the US they're not very common daily drivers anyway... and we have smaller ones. 2.0 diesel Ford Ranger is about on par with the fuel economy you claim for the Polo (is it really THAT high?). Same for some variants of the Toyota HiLux.

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

Once you put those 5 people in it, it is slow as fuck. I had a renault alliance when I was 18 and 4 people in that meant that I couldn't get enough speed to get out of 3rd. And going over the mountain pass in my home town was 2nd gear and 30mph at Best, on a 55mph road. Incredibly dangerous.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Uses between 6 and 7 liters of gas.

You ruined this car for me right now!