this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
26 points (69.1% liked)

Steam Hardware

22176 readers
54 users here now

A place to discuss and support all Steam Hardware, including Steam Deck, Steam Machine, Steam Frame, and SteamOS in general.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Deck] - Steam Deck related.
[Controller] - Steam Controller related.
[Machine] - Steam Machine related.
[Frame] - Steam Frame related.
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

If your post is only relevant to one hardware device (Deck/Machine/Frame/etc) please specify which one as part of the title or by using a device flair.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

idk who that guy is but I couldn't think of how to word the title, sorry

︀︀• Custom AMD Zen 4 CPU

︀︀• 6 cores / 12 threads

︀︀• RDNA 3 GPU

︀︀• 28 Compute Units

︀︀• 8GB GDDR6 VRAM

︀︀• 16GB DDR5 RAM

︀︀• 512GB or 2TB NVMe SSD

︀︀• SteamOS

︀︀• Wi-Fi 6E

︀︀• Bluetooth 5.3

︀︀• Gigabit Ethernet

︀︀• HDMI 2.0 + DisplayPort 1.4

︀︀• microSD expansion

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SavvyBeardedFish@reddthat.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think there are any 'cheap' Strix Halo chips out there, Valve probably got a massive discount (relatively) by using previous gen. laptop parts

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They say it's a custom design, so surely they could've custom-designed it to be unified rather than discrete if they wanted. I guess maybe they were trying to make sure it would only be bought by gamers by deliberately making it less versatile for AI?

[–] SavvyBeardedFish@reddthat.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Custom in this case doesn't really need to carry any weight either, it could be a simple voltage bump, clock bump, laser cutting cores etc. and they would still call it custom.

It's not a "from the ground up" custom chip. Unified still requires a significant amount of chip area per die, especially if they want to have a relatively beefy GPU (somewhere below Radeon 8060S, but above Radeon 780M).

I would imagine this gives the best perf./buck from Valve's POV, without costing an arm and a leg

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unified still requires a significant amount of chip area per die

Even compared to having two entirely separate memory controllers, one for the CPU and one for the GPU?

[–] SavvyBeardedFish@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I would assume the total area is larger for the separate CPU+GPU die when compared a single unified chip, sure. But the cost per millimeter doesn't necessarily scale linearly either (larger chip, lower yields), so it might be cheaper to buy CPU+GPU rather than the unified chip even though the total area is larger.

For reference, TechPowerUp lists:

RX 7600M: 204 mm² @ TSMC 6 nm

Strix Halo: 308 mm² @ TSMC 4 nm

Not sure what kind of area one could expect for the CPU alone (without the integrated GPU) for this kind of process