this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
7 points (70.6% liked)

jet's interesting finds

84 readers
4 users here now

my journal

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Yes, its generative, but it illustrates the idea

I was going to post on !fedimemes@feddit.uk but that instance has a no generative content policy.

I think a major limiter on lemmy growth are the instances that encourage talk of violence, crime, being abusive to others, and are just generally super combative... maybe not written into the instance rules, but as demonstrated by what instance admins don't enforce on their own users.

I know a schism is scary for a small society like lemmy, but I'm starting to think its necessary

if not a defederation, some protocol level whitelisting of users or comms that demonstrate the bare minimum of being able to play nicely with others (realizing this would take some novel work - like adding a user level whitelist to federation rather then the current banlist, and while were at it some eventual consistency in meta-state in bans)

Basically, the toxicity needs to be partitioned off, gated, or some level of meta-moderation for instances that wont police themselves to minimum levels of behavior. It's embarrassing to share lemmy with people I know now, given how off the wall it quickly gets.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snek_boi@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The right side looks sicks. Makes me wanna play some Blades in the Dark with my friends 🤤

[–] snek_boi@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

On a more serious note, I also sometimes wonder to what extent Lemmy is prone to FUD and content designed to increase anxiety rather than move us toward a better community.

Someone with the technical know-how could perhaps quantify the amount, proportion, and visibility of content that moves us toward valued ends compared to content that dumb us down to merely thinking about survival.