this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
921 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

84816 readers
3864 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

• Proton VPN has hit back at Canada's proposed Bill C-22

• The proposed legislation could require VPNs to log user metadata

• NordVPN and Windscribe have also slammed the bill

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 66 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (3 children)

If you're a Canadian, please contact your MP about bill C-22, and do it now. They're voting on this in the next few days.

https://dontsurveil.me/

Salt Typhoon, a hacking group connected to the Chinese government, used the backdoors put in place by CALEA in the US to spend months buried deep in US telecoms providers surveilling citizens. The Liberals are proposing to put in place a worse version of those exact same backdoors. Bring this up to your MP, remind them that when the Chinese (or North Koreans, Iranians, Russians, or even Americans) inevitably exploit these backdoors to do the same thing to us, it's going to blow up in their faces.

Read the link above for more salient points about why this is bad law. Read Open Media's articles on it (https://openmedia.org/press/item/ottawa-repackages-its-surveillance-backdoor-in-bill-c-22). Bring up these points to your MP. Email them. Phone and demand to speak to them. Make a stink about this.

If nothing else, send the form letter from Open Media (the other options are better, but something is better than nothing); https://action.openmedia.org/page/188754/action/1#main-content

They already tried to pass this law once and it failed. Yes, they have a majority now, but it is a very slim majority. If a few MPs defect this bill will die.

[–] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Pretty sure my MP blocked me because their office never respond to my inquiries.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Phone their office, demand to know why you haven't heard back from them. Make them search through their emails and pull up every message you ever sent. Make them uncomfortable. Be a problem.

[–] SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

What is a reasonable period of time to give them to respond to an email? They could be absolutely inundated with complaints, and it would be unreasonable to expect them to move particularly fast.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Instead of theorizing, just call and ask why they haven't responded. If the answer is "Because we're snowed under", well, there you go. And now they know that you really give a shit because you're badgering them for a response. They get a lot of form letters but very few people follow up. That immediately ups the seriousness in their minds.

Be unreasonable if you have to be. I don't mean impolite. Be nice to the human being on the other end of the line. But be demanding. Your MP works for you. Make them work.

[–] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 18 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

My MP told me to fuck off and that it was a good thing.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I'm not sure what you feel like you're adding with this reply.

Well done for making the effort. Thank you, and we all appreciate it.

But what do you want other people to take from this? Are you trying to discourage other people from taking action? Because you encountered resistance other people shouldn't try at all, even though they might end up speaking to someone more receptive?

Even your MP may end up changing their mind if enough people speak up. The goal is not to single-handedly sway their opinion, it's to add your voice to a growing chorus. You're joining a movement, not fighting a solo battle.

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago

I live in Quebec, my MP masturbates to videos of Donald Trump and times his nut for when Trump makes fun of the handicapped journalist.

[–] MrEff@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I like how you throw in 'even the Americans' with the spying groups. We definitely spy in all our allies. And in return we encourage our allies to spy on us. It is a very calculated political game where we (all the allied countries) pass legislation and safeguards in our respective home countries and declare our citizens free of authoritarian government surveillance, but then work with the other countries spy agencies to do it for us. We intentionally put in the backdoors in our peoples networks and hand the keys to our partners just so we can say 'well I wasn't spying on you. That would be illegal!' But in the end it is effectively the same. If the allied government finds anything of interest they just send a notification over. We each have boundaries that we respect in spying on each other's people too. It is almost a formallity by this point.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

And all of that would be fine if they were still acting like an ally.