this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
221 points (98.7% liked)

World News

56210 readers
2161 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Deconceptualist@leminal.space 12 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

No, you're right in general, but context and frame of reference are a thing. Here the discussion is specifically around reacting to the rise of Christian Nationalism.

This is Karl Popper's Paradox of Tolerance. If these christofascists are allowed to take power, they will aggressively erode tolerance of anyone else. And based on precedent they will lie and manipulate to get that power. The response must be swift and ironclad.

But knowing the UK cultural propensity for excessive politeness and unhealthy avoidance of social discomfort, they're probably screwed.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

But knowing the UK cultural propensity for excessive politeness and unhealthy avoidance of social discomfort, they're probably screwed.

This is a solid misunderstanding of, well, everything. Britain takes great zeal in tearing down those who purport to be moral. See: British Tabloids and British Satire. And as for religious leaders trying to make a political issue, that’s a big nope, and they will be savagely ridiculed for it.

The only way these weirdos can survive is by staying under the radar, like the mormons and the scientologists. Once they start to insinuate themselves in public discourse they’re ripped apart.

[–] Deconceptualist@leminal.space 1 points 7 hours ago

Oh? I'd be delighted for me to be wrong and you to be right on this.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

But the backlash to my comment is based on a strawman argument because people cannot imagine you can partially agree with a caveat. The implication of the downvotes here is that if I would say this, I must be a secret fascist. There's absolutely nothing objectively incorrect about what I said, in context or not. The only reason context would matter here is if you make assumptions about why I made this comment, and that requires a leap. Which apparently, people are very happy to make.

[–] Deconceptualist@leminal.space 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I only see one other reply to your comment, and I'm not sure it's making these assumptions.

Regardless, I already said I think you're right in the grand scheme of things and shared my input. But I didn't write the original comments you were responding to and have no need or desire to defend those.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

The many downvotes is what I am referring to