this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
198 points (98.1% liked)

Progressive Politics

4642 readers
488 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An in-depth analysis of the 2024 presidential campaign commissioned by the Democratic National Committee fails to mention the party’s position on Israel’s genocide in Gaza, prompting harsh criticism from Arab American members of the party.

The 192-page report, authored by a Democratic strategist and first published by CNN on Thursday morning, goes in-depth on several factors found to be detrimental to Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign in its ultimate loss to Donald Trump. Despite the contention within the party over then-President Joe Biden’s support for Israel’s genocidal campaign against Palestinians in Gaza, however, the war doesn’t get a single mention.

Also missing from the document are the words “Israel,” “Palestine,” “Arab American,” and “Muslim.”

“Nothing about this surprises me,” said Linda Sarsour, an organizer from Brooklyn who was active in organizing a campaign to pressure Harris to take a stance against the war. “If they don’t change course quickly to center Palestine, foreign policy and recognize the influence of Arab/Palestinian/Muslim/young/progressive American voters, they will likely have to write another autopsy report post 2028 presidential elections.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Or maybe you just exist in a bubble and can’t see out of it.

Between the Dems and the republicans, the Dems would have handled Israel and Gaza better than the republicans would have.

Furthermore, look at the “Most important issue” from the exit polling below. Note that foreign policy was 4%. People weren’t voting for Israel and Gaza.

https://www.cnn.com/election/2024/exit-polls/national-results/general/president/0

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Between the Dems and the republicans, the Dems would have handled Israel and Gaza better than the republicans would have.

Oh, yes, just look at how well the Biden administration handled it.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] AlHouthi4President@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Youre really out here glazing genocide Joe.

🫠

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 0 points 23 hours ago

Calling him bad is somehow glazing. Ok bubble boy.

[–] chilldrivenspade@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

no. it was a great propaganda campaign by maga to paint kamala as a war hawk and claim that only maga would stop these wars. many leftists were swayed against kamala bc of the perception that she would also be a puppet of israel. the crazy thing is how well it works to paint Dems badly while republicans can just openly do exactly what they feared dems would do….israel had a LOT to do with the left staying home, dude.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

True, exit polling doesn’t really capture people who stayed at home. But if you look at the poll below, it looks like the people that stayed at home were a little more in favor of Trump anyway.

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2025/06/26/voter-turnout-2020-2024/

israel had a LOT to do with the left staying home, dude.

I’d love to hear if there’s any real numbers that support this, or if it just feels right to you. I think most people cared about Gaza, but not more than gas prices.

Also, keep in mind that I don’t feel this way, I’m just saying this is the reality of US politics.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ok. You got nothing. Later gater

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In terms of winning and losing, yeah it’s nothing. And Israel/Gaza is a subset of foreign policy.

And if you look at the Israel/Gaza specific question, 60% of people responding think our support of Israel is either just right or not enough.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

In terms of winning 4% matters quite a lot. That is 8% to one side. Also imagine thinking "most important" means 100% of the reason a person votes.

[–] GuyIncognito@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And if you look at the Israel/Gaza specific question, 60% of people responding think our support of Israel is either just right or not enough.

If true, would this not indicate that american elections are meaningless and america has to be destroyed? Why care about the lesser of two evils in a pro-genocide country?

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] GuyIncognito@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Trump's been doing a bang-up job on it so far

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

While the Gaza war was a key issue for many Arab American and Muslim voters, particularly in a swing state like Michigan, Romman acknowledged that most voters nationwide and in her home state of Georgia were not listing Gaza as their top concern. Still, she said, the issue emerged as something of a smell test for the integrity of Democratic politicians hoping to sell their message to an electorate beset by financial insecurity and healthcare woes.

“For most voters, if you look at what was their top issue, it’s the economy — of course,” Romman said. “But if you want politicians that are going to put you first and implement the kind of economic issues that you need to have a better life, those are going to be the politicians that are not beholden to special interests. And so Gaza became a way to look for that.”