this post was submitted on 10 May 2026
4 points (100.0% liked)
Tolkien, Lord of the Rings (LotR), etc.
1672 readers
96 users here now
For all things Tolkien, Lord of The Rings (LotR), and The Hobbit across all media. Speak friend and enter.
Rules:
- No abusive language
- No buying, selling or advertising
- Be civil
- No politics
- No discussions about race
- No bots
- No memes or AI-generated content
- Don't criticize others for their opinions
- If you found the image on the web, it is encouraged to put the direct link to the image in the ‘Link’ field when creating a post, instead of uploading the image to Lemmy. Direct links usually end in .jpg, .png, etc.
- No unrelated posts
- No spoilers in title, mark spoilers
- Let people like what they like
- Follow all Lemmy.world rules
Please report any rule violations.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think maybe this didn't happen
I can totally see it. I think most people are imagining this as a six hour long continuous debate between panelists, which sounds unrealistic to me. More likely it was a conversation that started over lunch between a few attendees, then paused for the afternoon sessions (or w/e I don't know how Tolkien conferences are structured) and then picked back up during evening drinks. It could have gotten quite heated, and less scholarly, as the libations flowed, before OP mentioned the mead halls.
It's also possible that the scholars in question did know about the The Hobbit references but quibbled over whether that was a canonical reference, since JRRT wrote The Hobbit as a standalone work before retconning it into the broader Eä extended universe.