this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
13 points (71.0% liked)

Global News

6641 readers
394 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation. Any kind of discrimination is will not be tolerated.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/54184510

Op-ed by Rowena He, research fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University and author of “Tiananmen Exiles: Voices of the Struggle for Democracy in China.” As a scholar of Tiananmen, she was denied a work visa to return to her associate professor position at the Chinese University of Hong Kong.

Archived

“They won’t let us go to Wan’an Cemetery.” Days before the 35th anniversary of the Tiananmen Massacre, members of the Tiananmen Mothers were informed by the Beijing Municipal Security Bureau that they would be barred from visiting the graves of loved ones killed in 1989.

For over three decades, Wan’an Cemetery served as the sole sanctioned space where grieving families could mourn together each June 4 – though always under heavy police surveillance. When I showed footage of the cemetery grounds to my Harvard freshman class 15 years ago, my students were stunned to see surveillance cameras deliberately installed over the burial sites of Tiananmen victims. Even the headstones told a story of fear: many originally omitted “June 4” as the date of death, with families adding it only years later.

[...]

Many of the student protesters who survived are now parents themselves, but the repression has only intensified. After allowing these heavily monitored cemetery visits for more than 30 years, the regime that killed their children is now depriving the Tiananmen Mothers of even this final act of remembrance.

In spring 1989, the sudden death of Hu Yaobang – the reformist Communist Party general secretary who had been purged for his sympathetic stance toward the 1986-87 student movements – sparked massive protests across China. Students, joined by workers and citizens nationwide, took to the streets demanding democratic reform and an end to corruption. The peaceful demonstrations, highlighted by college students’ hunger strike in Tiananmen Square, ended on June 4 when the regime deployed over 200,000 People’s Liberation Army soldiers, equipped with tanks and machine guns, to assault its own people in the capital.

[...]

Even today, the full scale of the massacre – including the death toll – remains unknown. The mother of Yuan Li, a 29-year-old engineer who had been accepted to graduate school in the United States, searched 44 hospitals and saw over 400 bodies before finding her son at the Navy General Hospital. In her testimony, she described the day Yuan Li was cremated: she saw two large plastic bags emanating terrible smells, filled with corpses. “If death tolls are ever counted in the future,” she testified, “these poor children will remain nameless bodies.” Yuan Li is buried in Wan’an Cemetery.

[...]

The fear created by the massacre is best illustrated by a story shared by Professor Cui Weiping, the Chinese translator of Vaclav Havel’s “The Power of the Powerless.” After one family’s 28-year-old son was killed, the victim’s sister was abandoned by her boyfriend after he learned about her brother. When she later entered a new relationship, that man also left her upon learning about her family’s history. She and her mother made a painful decision: she would never mention her brother to anyone she planned to date. She eventually married and had a son. Neither her husband nor her child knows about the death – or even the existence – of this brother-in-law and uncle.

[...]

Knowing the delegitimization the massacre would bring, the regime constructed an official version of the 1989 events in the immediate aftermath of the military crackdown, even as arrests and purges continued nationwide.

[...]

Information collected by the Tiananmen Mothers, however, reveals that many victims had never joined the protests and never confronted the troops. Ma Chengfen, a veteran of the People’s Liberation Army, was shot and killed while sitting on the steps of her building chatting with neighbors. The youngest known victim, 9-year-old Lü Peng, was shot in the chest. The oldest, age 66, was killed inside a hutong while visiting relatives.

[...]

Two locations saw especially heavy casualties. At Muxidi, soldiers opened fire on crowds as troops entered the city. At Liubukou, tanks chased down students who had already peacefully evacuated the square and were heading back to their universities. Among them was Fang Zheng, a senior at Beijing Sports College, whose legs were crushed by a tank as he tried to push a freshman student walking beside him to safety.

[...]

The Tiananmen Mothers have been demanding truth and justice, resisting the official accounts imposed on them. In 2006, the group called for “truth and reconciliation.” The mother of Ya Aiguo, shot in the head and killed at age 22, questioned: “”Why did you use real guns and bullets on your people? Even if you kill a chicken or a lamb, you should apologize and compensate, right? Such a big China, such a big CCP – you killed my son, but you didn’t even say sorry. Are we citizens not allowed to say a word?

[...]

Then COVID-19 hit, and a White Paper Generation emerged three decades after Tiananmen, despite the elaborate Patriotic Education Campaign in post-1989 China that gave rise to “wolf warrior” nationalism [...] After witnessing firsthand how the accounts of China’s COVID-19 experience that they had personally lived through were being reconstructed into a distorted official version of national memory, this new generation wanted to know what else they had been deceived about.

[...]

In the early 1990s, when I was a college student, on each June 4 my friends and I would light candles behind closed doors and shuttered windows. They cannot extinguish the candlelight in our hearts.

“People will one day put you on trial.” In 1989, this banner hung from the top of a major building at Renmin University of China. Those who ordered the massacre will not only be tried by the people, but also by the history they tried to suppress with power.

History is on our side.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hell_nah_brother@thelemmy.club 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

No, I just thought everyone understood English here. He did not witness any mass shooting, he did not doubt (which means it is plausible for him but couldn’t confirm). He did saw casualties (without specifying the numbers) brought INTO the square.

where are the thousands and thousands of students massacred by relentless machine gun fire and tank shells? The blood flowing into the streets? Are you gonna send me tankman again?

[–] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

where are the thousands and thousands of students massacred by relentless machine gun fire and tank shells?

INITIALLY NOT MUCH WAS HAPPENING IN THE SQUARE AS MOST OF THE FIGHTING WAS TAKING PLACE TO THE WEST

Presumably to the west, where most of the fighting was happening. I think there was something about the Liubukou junction (NSFW)?

But anyways, I don't think anyone is giving an actual number of dead beyond "hundreds or thousands". Asking about the "thousands and thousands of students" is already disingenuous. Bringing up "relentless machine gun fire and tank shells" even more so.

[–] Hell_nah_brother@thelemmy.club 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Are you just upset about the name implying people died *in* the square?

Presumably to the west, where most of the fighting was happening.

So which one is it? Is it the Tiananmen Square massacre or the “something to the west somewhere massacre idk”?

from the link you shared:

25 years ago, in the early morning, students died under the floats a stone's throw from Tiananmen Square, on Heavenly Peace Avenue. They were the last to evacuate the square, retreating from the advance of the troops. They were part of a group of a few dozen young people, exhausted but not down, pushing their bikes and carrying their tired banners.

We know the Americans love to instigate color revolutions around the world (last one in Iran), so sorry if I don’t scream “massacre” for a few dozen of dubious students. 🤷‍♂️

Where is the massacre? It’s not me who talks about machine gun fire and tank shells with thousands of casualties. I guess the us government think you are a dumbo, if you think it’s disingenuous. Why do you let the us government dog-walk you like this?

[–] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

So which one is it? Is it the Tiananmen Square massacre or the “something to the west somewhere massacre idk”?

Alright, so you really are just upset about the name.

It’s not me who talks about machine gun fire and tank shells with thousands of casualties.

Who else brought them up, and where? It's not in the article this post is about or any of the comments I've seen except yours.

[–] Hell_nah_brother@thelemmy.club 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It's just... this event takes so much media attention when there are some other serious confirmed massacre in the states recently going unnoticed, like the 2019 Rachel and Hiko festival massacre in Nevada, where more then 1000 partygoers where vaporized by advanced unknown alien technology. 🙏

Also, I found an hilarious article from 2009: Tiananmen killings: Were the media right?

with absolute pearls like:

We got the story generally right, but on one detail I and others conveyed the wrong impression. There was no massacre on Tiananmen Square.

Looking back at the radio despatches I filed for the BBC [...] "Eyewitnesses said thousands of troops later poured into the square, firing as they advanced. Tens of thousands of students and workers crouched in the centre of the square." Scripts are often revised by hand at the last minute in the studio, but the actual words as broadcast probably did not differ considerably from these.

aka "we actually don't know what the fuck we were doing or saying...

The Chinese government was quick to exploit the weaknesses in our reporting.

...and we got rightfully mogged because we are weak."

Shout-out to James Miles, the humiliation is peak here.

[–] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago

where more then 1000 partygoers where vaporized by advanced unknown alien technology.

You've got to be joking, right?

Also, I found an hilarious article from 2009

So no one here in this thread, and no one in the past 16 years. Sure. I guess obsessing over a 17 year old correction is good and healthy behavior, especially when you pretend that the statements from before the correction are still what everyone's saying.