this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
297 points (94.6% liked)

me_irl

7807 readers
3183 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Citizen Kane. I sat through that entire movie three times before I finally accepted it wasn't for me. Now half the movies I start I don't finish. Just because someone else likes something doesn't mean I have to waste my time with it. Even if that someone is many respected film critics.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

There's actually a good reason for this! Explained in the TV Tropes page about why Seinfeld is Unfunny - basically that so many pieces of art were so revolutionary at the time, they they have been endless copied and reiterated over and over, so that modern audiences seeing the original piece of art don't see it as anything special.

Citizen Kane is called out specifically as:

Citizen Kane, oftentimes trumpeted as "The Greatest Movie of All Time," tends to inspire "what's the big deal?" responses from modern viewers, especially since Post Modern movies have become the norm and the cinematography has influenced so many other films. And everyone knows what the twist at the end is.

Citizen Kane was also, in the context of Hollywood at that time, a big challenge to the cheery sugar sweet Hollywood stories. It was critical of the idea of The American Dream and the notion of "success", namely that a man who is outwardly a public success like Kane could still be a failure in terms of personal ambitions and relationships. Its refusal to tack on an unconvincing Happy Ending similar to earlier serious films made it far harsher than other movies of that time. Subversions like this are much more common these days. The narrative structure where we see Kane at different parts of his life, all of them intercut with each other rather than following a straight chronological pattern from childhood to old age, was cited as an influence by the more radical film-makers of the 60s and 70s who enjoyed playing fast and loose with chronology.

[–] IndigoLarry@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I actually like Seinfeld. Larry David is great and the episodes and the* characters he created* give me a sense of calm and joy. It is a comfort show for me. [EDIT: Messy wording - sorry, on mobile.]

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah if you go to film school and learn about the context and all of the innovative filming techniques used, you'll probably consider it the greatest of all time. Which is why it's so highly rated by film critics.

But if you're just a regular person, it's not particularly interesting since you've seen many movies that were made later that used those same techniques and narrative structure.

I did enjoy all of the Simpson's references in it tho.

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

I actually enjoyed it. I'm not a movie buff or film snob, but I do like to include some old movies, so the very slow pacing didn't throw me. The imagery was good and I liked the cinematography. I wouldn't say it's a favorite but it was ok.

[–] portifornia@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago

Yep. This was that one for me, too. I actually loved the ending, but it made me feel so bitter for the middle 109 minutes I had to sit through to get there! Never again.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Who told you you had to watch it?