this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
180 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

85163 readers
3948 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
180
US firm validates 1.1-GW nuclear fusion plant design to deliver 400 MW electricity (interestingengineering.com)
submitted 1 day ago by Delta_V@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
48 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS) has verified the core plasma physics assumptions for its upcoming ARC fusion power plant following a peer-reviewed study published in the Journal of Plasma Physics.

The research confirms the ARC reactor design aligns with known physics, allowing the company to shift its focus toward detailed hardware engineering...

According to the validated models, the ARC plant will produce approximately 1.1 gigawatts (GW) of fusion power to generate 400 megawatts (MW) of net electricity for the grid...

CFS engineers are using this simulation framework to optimize upcoming design iterations, adjusting dimensions like tokamak width and divertor length to refine reactor performance before manufacturing begins.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world -2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

Extremely complex and expensive engineering and technology development for 400 MW of net electricity generation. Why not just build a 400 MW solar farm (with battery shortage, of course)? There's a massive, natural fusion reactor in the sky blasting the Earth with petawatts of energy every day, for absolutely free.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago

Because you can't stably power a grid on solar. You need to buffer with a source of energy not dependent on environment.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 21 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

This is like asking “why do R&D to invent solar panels when gas has always been 25¢/gallon?”

Technological progress isn’t free.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Technological progress isn’t free.

I'm just not convinced progress scales 1:1 with increasing technological complexity. In fact, I think progress might be better achieved by lowering costs and complexity, rather than increasing them. Maybe more isn't always better.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

It's funny you should mention scaling, because fusion does not scale like that at all, it scales much better. If you can get a small reactor to work at all, a larger reactor designed with the same principles is significantly more efficient. With fusion, bigger is better.

I do hear what you're saying though. Sometimes there are just simpler solutions. And I actually think you're right, in most use cases solar + batteries is a better solution than a fusion plant. That said, solar + batteries has only become truly economical within the last 5-10 years. At this point there's really nothing "Simple" about photovoltaic or battery technology, lifetimes of study have gone into them. And 25 years ago, solar was cute, it was pie in the sky. And you'd hear these same arguments "shouldn't we be focusing efforts on something we already know works?"

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The amount of electricity we will be able to extract from nuclear fusion, while using an extremely small amount of fuel, means that solar panels may cease to be practical in the first place.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

Fusion still has a massive up front cost that needs to be recouped for decades.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

So you’re saying solar panels were a mistake and we should have stuck to horses?

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I should clarify. I think increasing technological complexity can lead to progress, but I don't think it always does. I think progress from increasing technological complexity often follows an s-curve. I'm not denying the progress that has come from the significant technological advancement of the last few centuries, I'm just not sure continued technological advancement will lead to that same level of progress over the next few centuries.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

Maybe, but many things are increasingly efficient. Maybe energy need for most things is plateauing and flat id goud enough. You’ll just need fusion for datacenters

[–] sunnie@slrpnk.net 18 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Because this is how research works and if we manage to get fusion power generation working well, we’ll have practically limitless clean energy available.