196
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
Moderator Guidelines
- Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
- Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
- When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
- Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
- Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
- Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
- Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
- Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
- Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
- Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
- Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
- Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
- First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
- Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
- No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
- Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
- Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.
view the rest of the comments
I'm asking why you're so sure it has to be doing exactly that when GOG had no reason to be doing that and there's no context for doing that.
I would prefer not to jump to conclusions until there is a conclusion.
Scroll up to Chloé 🥕’s exhibition of GOG’s dogwhistling apologetics. It's pretty clear to us harmed by Nazis, and the majority of folks experienced in Nazi whistles that the subject line could have been typed extremely differently, esp. when the developers themselves admitted the Newsletter was all Gog’s doing.
Still waiting the why. It's such a braindead move, I don't see why they would so randomly sabotage themselves like this.
I believe it is not sabotage. They are trying to attract a specific type of customers who would be interested to play a «Slavic adventure».
It seems that they thought these target customers are Nazi-sympathisers.
you were given clear evidence for the claims made, nobody is making you agree with it. its a diffrent matter if you want to continue to take the side of people whos argument boils down to, its not racist its your fault because you didnt see it the way we interpreted, thats just a bad look.
I was given assumptions and circumstances. It's not evidence, but a choice to believe. I chose to hold reservations until everything is made clear. Those who make certainties out of guesses will get bitten by it eventually. I'd prefer to avoid that.
Who did what is uncertain right now. That's not up for discussion. None of us were there and we only have the end result to go on, so any reconstruction of the facts has to differentiate between what's closest to what happened and what's made to fit the end result as we see it.
Just because we have the lego pieces to make something doesn't mean it's what those pieces were made to build.
Same as all of us here. We’ll have to wait on Monday to learn why they hired a Nazi to publish this newsletter in their Boże Ciało weekend.