this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
26 points (93.3% liked)

UK Politics

5535 readers
90 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/exemptions/a-guide-to-the-data-protection-exemptions/

UK GDPR is barely worth the paper it's written on considering the long list of exemptions.

Aye it was stricter before Brexit, but Mandelson has been in the game so long that there wasn't a GDPR when he began. Every law seems to have exemptions and clauses about politicians and public bodies. I'm sure if Mandelson had a chance of suing the Cabinet Office over this he would have done so already, he isn't lacking in access to lawyers.

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yes there is a long list of exemptions.

Which one allows for disclosure of personal data for political reasons/public pressure?

Maybe its an area of data protection law I'm not familiar with, but I'm not seeing it.

As for what Mandelson chooses to do, that's upto him. I've worked with lawyers for over 20 years, unless its something they specialise in theres a good chance they just haven't thought of it.

He's a cunt, and personally I'm glad we know how shitty the recruitment and vetting process for him was.

But professionally? Its sub-par, if someone in HR where I work did this I'd be recommending dismissal.

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago

Lol.

It's a bit thin, but I'm sure they'll find some way of making it fit and then back dating any justification assessments they create to pretend they'd thought of it before they breached 😀