this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
234 points (98.0% liked)

World News

56421 readers
2001 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/world/p/1177103/idf-soldier-shot-and-killed-a-seven-month-old-baby-in-hebron-the-bullet-passed-through-h

Sam Abu Haikel was killed last night after being shot by a soldier in the Tel Rumeida neighborhood of Hebron. His parents, who were with him in the car on their way to his grandmother’s house, were also injured by the infiltration of the bullets. IDF Spokesperson Confiscated the Things But Hurried to Cover and Protect Soldiers

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deacon@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I’m truly not disputing your point, and I don’t assume that you support genocide as a matter of belief.

But the top level comment started with the assertion that we ‘need to erase israhell off the planet’ which is a genocide. Your point was deployed in response to someone saying, in so many words, ‘maybe we shouldn’t do a genocide because not all people of a nationality believe the same thing’.

Then you come in with, in so many words, ‘yeah, but most of them do’ - as a further reason to…not do a genocide?

What point is your comment serving other than to soften the reason not to do a genocide?

[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My point was concentrated on a specific part of your comment related to the number of Israelis who oppose genocide and colonialism. Distorting reality by claiming a big number of Israelis oppose it is dangerous and help Israel continuing the extermination of Palestinians . Jerusalem Day Flag March where Israelis chant death to Arab and burn Arab villages has ten thousands of people in them while counter protests have few hundreds.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 3 points 1 day ago

I've had a similar comment chain to this, it seems Israeli defenders have the same argument strategy, where they try to put words in your mouth. Kind of embarrassing for them.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Israel is a state. Wiping it off the map does not assume genocide. Your pushing that narrative is a zionist talking point. Israel CAN be wiped off the map without murder. Will you admit to that?

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Israel CAN be wiped off the map without murder. Will you admit to that?

Will I admit to that? What kind of question is that? Of course I will ‘admit to that’, since you’ve backed me into a rhetorical corner.

Now, since we’re admitting things. How often do you think the historical use of the term is describing a non-violent process?

Fuck Zionism, and Free Palestine but the language of erasure is just too close to genocide for my comfort, as cathartic as the thought may be in the moment, and I’m hesitant to normalize it.

Other people don’t have that sensitivity and that’s fine. You do you.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What kind of question is that?

Hasbara propoganda constantly states that giving any justice at all to Palestinians for the very real and very concrete harm they have endured risks inflicting harm against Israelis born to the area. It attempts to weigh an non life threatening existential harm to a small number of Isarelis against a very severe and concrete life threatening already in flight genocide of a massive number of innocents. You just parroted that so maybe ask yourself whether you are commenting for justice or not.

How often do you think the historical use of the term is describing a non-violent process?

Remediating a genocide only comes up so often but South Africa did it pretty well and thats the most modern addressing of a similar issue that I'm aware of. So no, I dont buy your suggestion that its a common understanding-- and even if it were (its not), its a harmful framing in this case that you shouldnt be trying to normalize to win lemmy points.

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I’d love to know what you think Lemmy points are. I take the signals that are given, and so we’re done. Peace to you.