this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
1025 points (99.5% liked)
Technology
85208 readers
4014 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I didn't know that the SNP500 had such rules, but I'm so happy they didn't cave.
I hope people sue the indexes for changing the rules. Im not sure its possible but it really makes an index meaningless if its not consistent.
Nasdaq and Russel caved though. I don't know if there is a way to avoid them in our 401k.
You should have the ability to select the investments in your 401k.
I mean, every company I participated in just give a menu of 20 or 40 mutual funds, targeting different maturation points or Industries, and people absolutely are allowed to pick which funds they want their 401K allocated into. It's just going to require an additional 10 minutes of searching to find out how much AI diaper load is riding in your preferred funds, and possibly having to forgo growth funds and total index funds for some number of seasons.
Personally, I just moved to roughly 40% in Int'l funds despite ASML and TSMC being featured prominently, because it is still a net reduction in exposure and because I need the diversification (~10% a S&P 500' value is directly exposed either AI or semiconductor, and roughly 33% of S&P 500 is straight Tech of some flavor).
We had a zoom meeting with my elderly mother's investment adviser recently and expressed our concern about the AI bubble. He of course said he didn't think it was a bubble; his main argument was "these CEOs are smart people and they're legally obligated to preserve the financial health of their companies so they wouldn't be going in for anything that had the potential to be a bubble". Conveniently ignoring all the other bubbles in history when the CEOs were "smart people".
Ah, yes, is this a portrait of her advisor?
Ah yes, Raymond gripping hands with James.
Completely unrelated, if you have chickens I hope they are doing splendidly.
World needs a lot more backyard chickens.
I am actually chickenless and male and I hate life. My name is a Kids in the Hall reference.
I dig KITH, but I love chickens more. Also: identify as dude.
Every time I try to introduce someone to that show we start Ina eaosn own and I think I traumatize them.
It's a fact!
I actually just went hella heavy on Int'l and value stocks, in order to completely divest from Musk exposure in my retirement accounts.
Which muskless and ai-less indexes u found? I'm working on the same
VTV is value stocks, so minimal exposure. AND Vanguard Healthcare fund has often had consistent performance across Market Cycles. I haven't yet found an anti AI portfolio.
I'm looking ex-us for my growth and blended strategies. VXUS and VEA principally.
Every 401k I and my wife have had let us set which index, but would rebalance itself every year because they believe they know better. It’s really annoying, but if you’re familiar with the markets, I would say it’s very necessary. Especially since the default funds will often have fees associated to them.