this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
63 points (94.4% liked)
Linux and Tech News
3502 readers
43 users here now
This is where all the News about Linux and Linux adjacent things goes. We'll use some of the articles here for the show! You can watch or listen at:
You can also get involved at our forum here on Lemmy:
Or just get the most recent episode of the show here:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
But they don’t make money from advertising…
They spend money.
Ideally you spend less on the advertising campaign than you make in new customers.
Sometimes that’s the case, but Proton have free tiers, so new customers can just cost more money on top of the cost to acquire them.
They are a corporation in capitalism. Please stop being facetious.
Market share and user metrics are also valuable.
But give no direct revenue, in fact for free customers they continue to cost the corp money.
And what does "valuable" mean, in this context?
It is of benefit to the company, I guess?
I think you have pegged me as a pro capitalist. Let me assure you to the contrary.
They spend the money they made. Your point is unclear.
100% seriously I don’t understand what this means.
Proton spend the money they made?
I guess we're both scratching our heads then
I think it may be worth asking yourself why a company would spend that money: They do so in the hopes that it makes them more. The only reason they exist is to make money.
Whether you think this was an honest mistake or sign of something nefarious, the idea that a company spends money on advertising just to throw money into the void and see no return is a bit silly 😅. The hope is that some subset of folks advertised to join their service, and some subset of those pay money for it. If they don't make more money from gained paying customers than the ammount they spent on advertising then it was an objectively incorrect business choice...