this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
63 points (94.4% liked)

Linux and Tech News

3502 readers
176 users here now

This is where all the News about Linux and Linux adjacent things goes. We'll use some of the articles here for the show! You can watch or listen at:

You can also get involved at our forum here on Lemmy:

Or just get the most recent episode of the show here:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

This is welcome, after its done they need to work on bringing Linux VPN app up to the level of its MacOS and Windows counterparts

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world -3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)
[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 days ago (2 children)

People in that link saying he just got an automated link, rather than a negotiated deal.

Do you have thoughts around that?

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If they don't get enough money from an advertising deal to be able to afford a short background check, they shouldn't do the advertising deal.

It's up to Proton to make a public apology and change their policies so they don't give money to fascists. Until then, they are a company that gives money to fascists.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works -4 points 5 days ago (3 children)

But they don’t make money from advertising…

They spend money.

[–] coffee_tacos@mander.xyz 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ideally you spend less on the advertising campaign than you make in new customers.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works -5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sometimes that’s the case, but Proton have free tiers, so new customers can just cost more money on top of the cost to acquire them.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They are a corporation in capitalism. Please stop being facetious.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works -3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Market share and user metrics are also valuable.

But give no direct revenue, in fact for free customers they continue to cost the corp money.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And what does "valuable" mean, in this context?

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works -2 points 4 days ago

It is of benefit to the company, I guess?

I think you have pegged me as a pro capitalist. Let me assure you to the contrary.

[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 1 points 3 days ago

I think it may be worth asking yourself why a company would spend that money: They do so in the hopes that it makes them more. The only reason they exist is to make money.

Whether you think this was an honest mistake or sign of something nefarious, the idea that a company spends money on advertising just to throw money into the void and see no return is a bit silly 😅. The hope is that some subset of folks advertised to join their service, and some subset of those pay money for it. If they don't make more money from gained paying customers than the ammount they spent on advertising then it was an objectively incorrect business choice...

[–] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They spend the money they made. Your point is unclear.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

100% seriously I don’t understand what this means.

Proton spend the money they made?

[–] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I guess we're both scratching our heads then

[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I think people love to hate proton but also they are very much deserving of scrutiny. Given they have voiced some sentiments in the past that many read as "pro-maga" they should be be scrutinized

And also, my impression has generally been that when scrutinized (which happens VERY regularly) they dont really seem to be doing anything nefarious. But we keep having things crop up that create scrutiny, which I feel is equal parts concerning, and also likely somewhat a product of hypervigilance (which itself is neither good nor bad)

Here's someone contemporaneously scrutinizing those "pro-maga" comments made around the beginning of trumps second term, and with some grace shown to proton (you can decide if they deserve it), concludes the comments are understandable, even if its clear how divorced from reality they are in retrospect (that many could also see as such at the time they were made). But the author makes the fair argument that the CEO of proton reasonably may not have had that perspective at the time and may have been caught off guard by a anti-big-tech pick for trumps cabinet. I don't think the interpretation they explain is wrong.

But we keep having concerns with them. Sometimes hollow (they turned over a Stop Cop City organizer's payment data when legally required by the country theyre incorporated in, which is what what literally any company would do), sometimes a bit less so, like making pro trump comments that may be true but that feel shortsighted, and failing to scrutinize who they partner with as an influencer

[–] nagaram@piefed.social 3 points 4 days ago

The updated apology is sufficient for me.

I'm mad it took Protondrive this long to come to linux