this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
1044 points (99.4% liked)

memes

21507 readers
1971 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 71 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Is there a word for memes that totally lack the context of their original images to the point of being opposite the intention of the creator?

Because I think the next scene is Ledger's Joker setting that pile of money on fire.

[–] flamingleg@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 hours ago

the only thing that's changed is that today gas is not cheap

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, the scene is literally Joker gathering the money to burn it in front of some gang boss to show him that he doesn't care about the money.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago

In that interpretation; the boss just agrees with what his company's HR is putting out, so it would really be a non-meme...

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

I could squint a little and make a case that this represents a CEO who is about to spend a shitload of company money on AI (or any anti-human venture) rather than employees.

[–] EyIchFragDochNur@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are people who will never know, the movie is 18 years old now

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, but isn't it in the pantheon of Movies Everyone's Seen like The Wizard of Oz and The Matrix?

[–] EyIchFragDochNur@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've never seen wizard of Oz. And idk, there have been several Batman movies since then..

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Huh. Do you particularly care about movies? I think I'm old enough that movie history (watching the classics) was a pretty common hobby... these days, I guess people are patient gaming and there's a lot more anime to catch up on, on top of all the scrolling.

[–] EyIchFragDochNur@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

I did watch a lot of movies. Tho not a junkie. I guess watching wizard of Oz is very much an US thingy, I only know it from cartoon series like Simpsons or so.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That's correct. The original story is about American monetary policy.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago

Cryptocity where the streets are paved with blockchains and the mayor is AI.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago

It also has some damn good music... somewhere over the rainbow and if I only had a brain are bangers, and Judy Garland was a touchstone for gay boomers...

Understanding references was part of the draw, too... if I keep seeing a reference to something, I want to watch it. The biggest problem is being unaware that something even is a reference. The Simpsons DVD commentary is eye-opening in that regard.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 1 points 1 day ago

At least he had a proper understanding of the value of a dollar.