this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
47 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2196 readers
849 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

Did everyone forget that anyone can use any device and it's not like any specific device is literally under your skin and directly, permanently tied to you? We aren't teletubbies with our devices built into our chests.

How the living fuck do they expect this to work? What if it's a shared device?

Everything about this shit is so fucking sutpid eat shit Starmer.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 30 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Having devices, their activity, and content tied to individuals is the goal.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yep, he wants to "protect" children by having access to all their data. Just like a homophobic Republican on Grindr. Gotta say though he learned projection from the master of it, his daddy Hitleryahu.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

How the living fuck do they expect this to work?

Police commit stocastic violence against the underclass, then justify the abuse by saying "we found illegal activity on their cell phones"

[–] certified_expert@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Coz the objective never was protecting anybody

[–] JesusTheCarpenter@feddit.uk 1 points 5 days ago

Maybe he is talking about devices that are created with accounts for children specifically. Google allows that (not sure about meta). This allows parents to monitor and control that device remotely. But than again, that is something I would imagine already existed or it's stil up to the parents to disallow it, etc.