timewarp

joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If they were doing an okay job, title would be something like, "Pathological liar and narcissistic pedophile makes claims without evidence." With a disclaimer at the top:

"Believing what this pathological liar says without absolute evidence is a mental illness."

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Mainstream media is captured. They repeat the bullshit narratives every week. You've gotta be retarded to believe them at this point.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But why wouldn't you hand over your passport to a company that sells your data to anyone willing to pay for it?

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Anyone know of any Italian plumbers than can remind Trump he's full of shit?

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

But Israheil is the only demoncracy in the Middle East! /s

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago

uBlock Origin Light works fine. In fact I prefer it for the most part. They should have found better ways to provide the exact same features in MV3 though even if that meant additional warnings or prompts. I get why declarative requests provide more privacy and safety, but there will always be power users who'd rather have more choice.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago

Ask Musk. Word is he fucked a horse and made a centaur using a cattle prod to give it that magic spark. That is how he came up with the name Tesla.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Generally no you should never put your trust in any attorney, even the ones you pay. But if you don't know what you're doing and not willing to spend the time, then any attorney is better than making a fool of yourself.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Not really. It depends if you're willing to understand the legal framework and process, and adequately research case law... and have some money and time. The more you learn the easier it is to predict what legal arguments or defenses the other side will make before they even make them.

Criminal cases are obviously different but most prosecutors are already understaffed, so if you don't roll over for them and do the things an actual descent attorney would do, then a public defender isn't automatically better. A public defender will almost always try to get you to to take the very first plea offer. Rarely do you even get one that actually fights for their clients, especially when there is an injustice.

But you must commit the time and it is exhausting mentally. I'd almost always rather pay for an attorney, but there have been times when the attorneys said no, and I knew the attorneys were wrong. In both instances I won major cases by myself and even had opposing counsel try to recruit me at their firm afterwards saying they'd pay for me to get a law degree.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Will be really helpful for Israel to defend itself against babies in Gaza.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yep, he wants to "protect" children by having access to all their data. Just like a homophobic Republican on Grindr. Gotta say though he learned projection from the master of it, his daddy Hitleryahu.

17
T-Mobile Sidekick iD (www.wired.com)
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by timewarp@lemmy.world to c/nostalgia@lemmy.ca
 

This is one of the best phones I ever owned. You could type nearly as fast on it as a traditional keyboard. It even had a scroll ball as well to act like a mouse. The things I would do for Google to implement something like this in a modern Pixel phone. I hate even trying to respond to people these days from my phone, because of how just how bad touch keyboards are in comparison.

 

This subject arose because I had been looking for ways to use Microsoft & Google's Family features to manage my kids in a co-parenting arrangement. I have children with my ex that I currently manage. She has other children that she manages.

I quickly learned however that the features are only designed for parents that are still together & that don't have kids outside their relationship.

For example, parents & kids can only be assigned to one family plan. So she, or her partner, can't maintain their own plan while still managing the kids that I share with her.

Now I thought this was poor planning on Microsoft & Google's part to design their products around a traditional family. This might not rise to the levels of discrimination most people are concerned with, but it got me thinking.

For example, if a company learns someone was born out of wedlock if they can refuse to hire them. One of the reasons we have protected classes is to prevent discrimination based on personal characteristics that have been held to be suspect when used as the basis of statutory differentiations. Surprisingly, there are little to no protections when it comes to people born out of wedlock.

Even protections from discrimination by the government for children born out of wedlock is not absolute. While the Supreme Court has interpreted the Constitution to provide some protection from the government, it has been inconsistent and contains intentional loopholes that allow for the imposition of greater procedural burdens.

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt14-S1-8-7-3/ALDE_00000834/

To me this is surprising, considering that individuals cannot control whether their parents were married or stay together, but yet are not protected by the constitution & congress has not made laws to protect individuals in such scenarios. Some states have included limited protections, but those are generally applied to the parents & are specific to things like housing, not when it comes to employment.

 

Netanyahu starts a war & then hides in a bunker.

 

Update: Mastodon.social has decided to ban my account for posting content that is anti-genocide.

I've generally felt like progressives were the first community to call out the genocide being committed by Israel. I also had assumed Mastodon.social was more progressive, although I had seen lots of defense of genocide when Biden was the one supporting it. Recently however I encountered a post claiming Palestinian was a newly invented term to describe Arabs in Gaza, and that the word Palestinian itself was antisemitic & represented the eradication of Jews.

I responded that statements like this makes it easier to dehumanize Palestinians, and that there really is no difference between Nazi Germany & Israel at this point. However, the mods at Mastodon.social removed my response claiming it is Holocaust inversion.

There are plenty of Jews that are against the genocide & mass murder Israel is conducting. It is a real shame that Mastodon.social mods believe the genocide being carried out by Israel represents the views of all Jews worldwide, and the mods intend to use the Holocaust to justify it.

 

After Biden's terrible debate that showed us the Wizard behind the curtain in plain view, my immediate reaction was to re-evaluate the media and establishment Democrat's response to the Robert Hur investigation. The investigation declined prosecution, noting they were convinced Biden was an "elderly man with poor memory." Little did we know, this meant Biden couldn't even recall what year Trump was elected.

The Democratic apparatus went into overdrive to defend Biden, claiming he was young and dynamic behind the scenes. Biden's press secretary stated many times that he was more energized than ever, and no one in his administration ever doubted his mental capacity. In fact they argued it was so strong, that it was offensive to question it. Afterall, did Biden even need to campaign and talk to the press when everyone "knew" just how vigorous he was.

Biden asserted executive privilege over the tapes with Republicans eventually voting to hold Merrick Garland in contempt for failing to provide them. If they had released the tapes after the investigation, they could have left it to the people to judge at the beginning of February, 2024. Instead, we were forced to wait until Biden's shocking June debate performance, where we all saw the emperor had no clothes and that we had been gaslit and lied to by the same people that we felt obliged to trust. Afterall, they kept telling us democracy depended on it.

In this moment, had Democrats not insisted there was nothing to hide and do-nothing Merrick Garland actually provided the tapes publicly, it could have presented a new candidate sooner.

 

Sass is a popular open-source CSS framework for building websites. It is commonly used in some of the most popular open source projects, like Next.js. It is one of the few open source projects that when developers navigate their website for docs or whatever, they see a banner at the top of the page that says "Free Palestine." It is a shame that more software projects are too scared to show their support for Palestine, or that are actually opposed to Palestine's existence.

 

Trump is bad. I agree... but why is the left suddenly all sympathetic towards rich people & CEOs like this, who exploit cheap labor.

view more: next ›