this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
452 points (98.9% liked)

World News

56507 readers
3261 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 56 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

I watched the Veritasium episode on it just yesterday! The other theory is that it was actually being used for covert signals and the disruption was secondary.

[–] Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I thought that was the cover story. They deliberately used a channel partially in the bandwidth for some deniability. It isn't like they didn't know what bandwidth GPS used when they designed the satellite.

[–] bilb@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

If I recall correctly, the idea was that they might have used that part of the band deliberately so that it couldn't be jammed without also jamming GPS. Either way, we're just guessing.

[–] Devadander@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Considering the impact of these tests, that doesn’t seem likely. You wouldn’t be sending covert messages in a way that would be so heavily scrutinized. I know it was a theory presented during the video, but that’s just journalistic integrity.

And ultimately, even if they were covert messages, now they also know they can disrupt gps

[–] Fatal@piefed.social 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think the point was less about making the messages undetectable as it was about making them unjammable. In order to stop their transmission, we would have to essentially shut down GPS for the entire EU. So you might use that frequency to send critical, must-have messages.

[–] hakase@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 days ago

Especially once a second signal was noticed that was almost exactly the frequency used by the Chinese GPS system, as mentioned in the Veritasium video.

[–] dickalan@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

last I checked that channel was owned by private equity so take it with a grain of salt

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Yes, that's the video I watched. Good stuff.