It doesn't have to be a real production car, it can also be a concept.
For me, it has to be the 1997 Dodge Copperhead. This ugly chungus just speaks to me and I don't know why. It is hideous, Pontiac Aztek levels of ugly, but I kinda wish Dodge actually sold it. It wasn't going to be gutless, sharing much with the Viper, but it also wasn't going to have the same price of the Viper (Viper at the time was ~$75k, this baby would have been ~$30k). For the price, a little ugly isn't that big of a deal for a similar powertrain. Surely a facelift kit could help it out some.
Just thought a discussion like this could be fun. What cars are the same for you?
For what it's worth, the Pacifica is absolute hot garbage. I owned a 2013 Grand Caravan for some years (it was acceptable, but the trans was starting to get problematic....I know, shocker), but once the new Pacifica dropped, the forums got filled up pretty quick with problem after problem. At least most of the issues with the 5th gen Caravan had fixes or workarounds... But like every other Chrysler product, the quality was just not there.
My ex took the Caravan in the divorce (we agreed on it, I don't miss either one of them), it only had ~90k on the clock at that time. I ended up buying a 2008 Sienna to replace it; 230k on the clock, the black paint was - and still is - ratty with rattlecan patchwork, and it only has a 5-speed vs the Caravan's 6-speed; yet to this day, I still feel like I upgraded ๐๐
Oh definitely, I just think the exterior styling isn't bad looking. It is still a Chrysler afterall. Well I guess its a Fiat now, which is worse, honestly.
Even worse - it's Stellantis
(talk to your dr to see if Stellantis is right for you)