this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
259 points (98.9% liked)

politics

30031 readers
2146 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] panthera_@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Something is going on very strange. Last month the economy added 172,000 jobs while unemployment remained at 4.3%.

[–] Folstar@lemmus.org 6 points 21 hours ago

The way that number is derived is hilariously old fashioned and error prone. They don't change it so they can plausibly put out month after month big job gains then quietly adjust it down later. Trump has been doing this the whole time with neutral to amazing job reports in most of the past 18 months yet, somehow, over those 18 months job gains are near zero.

It's also worth noting that the official unemployment rate has been unbelievably stable. As in, no one should believe it. Workforce participation has dropped from 62.5% to 61.8% during Trump2 telling us unemployment has gone up, but they're massaging one number to make another look good.

[–] faintwhenfree@lemmus.org 4 points 22 hours ago

Oh the added jobs are people doing second jobs or even third jobs. Because some of the working class people I know in the US. Are all looking for a second job. My mechanic friend after his shift at the garage drives Uber late till 11pm. Another store manager friend, goes and works as a cashier for a bodega for 4 hours, because he needs that cash to just survive.

That's how they're adding the jobs.

[–] Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

They are cooking the books but also they don't count people that have given up as unemployed, regardless of age.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Where is the credible source data you trust for any of this downstream analysis? All collecting/reporting agencies have been corrupted or defunded at this point.

Maddening to see people doing things like citing the current CDC for medical information - we're seven layers deep into hell at this point. You're clinging to an illusory normalcy, and sharing it with others to comfort yourself as society actively burns down around you.

Or whatever.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

The number of people they use in that kind of calculation is constantly shifting.

If you add 100k jobs, while also having 100k people entering the demographic, then the % is gonna stay the same

[–] Town@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

The break even rate for unemployment is complicated and shifts arrive. Immigration, deaths, Labor force participation, who gets counted as employed or unemployed, etc all factor in.

Ballpark 150k is about 0.1% of employed Americans currently.

They are fucking with the numbers though.