448
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
448 points (99.6% liked)
Technology
85355 readers
5340 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So, a shit cop who has no business having a badge and a gun does a shit job. Who'd have figured? In my opinion, all settlements of claims against improper policing should come from police retirement funds, not public funds. Put the liability on those capable of making the changes necessary to correct the situation.
It seems like a lot of cops are into domestic violence. And these are the people who are trusted to keep us safe.
I've seen it proposed that cops should have to start carrying essentially malpractice insurance that they pay for out of their own pocket and that would cover payouts in the event that they get sued. This would have the added advantage that all those "bad apples" that somehow always seem to end up transferred to new precincts instead of fired and banned for life wouldn't be able to get anyone to insure them effectively banning them.
While that's the hope, if an insurance agent refused to cover a cop (even if for good reason) that agent would spend the next six months to a year having to buy new headlights every time they drive.
If an insurance company refused to carry a cop, they'd be sued out of existence by every police union and booster org in the nation.
That's stalking and illegal. I also don't think I've ever known the full name of any insurance rep but i didn't use local ones.
Legalities never stopped them before.
The agent is a local, usually small business, and acts as a buyer on your behalf. They guide you on coverage to get, and the options available to you.
Those quotes come from the major insurance companies you always see advertised. They are the ones underwriting your coverage. These are almost invariably faceless corporations, with decisions by faceless computers.
The local agent can't do anything but recommend coverage elsewhere.
Good idea.
I very much agree. A more just solution would see settlements from cases such as this should come from the police unions funds, or as you suggested - not from taxpayers.
Unfortunately they're probably scraping the bottom of the barrel for people willing to do such a terrible job.