politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I'm convinced that Nicole Brown Simpson was killed by the Epstein network because through OJ she had found out what was happening and was disgusted and threatened to expose them.
I remember that whole thing pretty well: Nicole Brown Simpson was killed in the summer of 1994 and of course no one was talking about anything else for most of 1995, which was the arrest and trial. "If it fits, you must acquit," remember? These were the days of Windows 3.1 and 3.11, and I even had a screensaver of a little white Bronco very slowly being chased horizontally by a couple blinky blinky cop cars. It was good for a laugh.
But Epstein was not a part of that Hollywood set at all, as far as I ever knew. I could be wrong, but California was not really Epstein's world, Epstein was very busy with robbing Les Wexner blind in NY and Ohio at the time, and there was always more than enough history in regard to OJ's ongoing excessive, abusive behavior toward Nicole to explain why OJ did it, if he did it.
So when I read your comment, it seems a bit of an uphill climb, to be honest. Is there evidence that made you think that? I'd be interested in hearing it if you'd like to share.
OJ and Trump were best of friends, friends talk, partners talk. it's said that Nicole loathed trump. I don't think it's a giant leap to suggest OJ found out about those parties and it got around to his partner. Epstein was abusing children from the mid 80s, trump and OJ were best of friends in the early 90s. Is it unfeasible that trump said something to his friend and his friend then passed that on to his partner. I personally always operate under the assumption that if you are telling someone something secret you are telling their partner too, add to this Epstein operating a honey trap for one or more national security agencies then you have vested interests that would want to shut down any exposure and who have hitman and assassins on speed dial.
I don't see it as a huge leap.
I did not remember this, so I looked it up. I had forgotten all about this, but you're right. Thick as thieves back in the day.
Yeah, that's absolutely true regardless of any other factor.
Also proven, in my personal opinion, especially in regard to Israel. Epstein had ties to both Mossad and Ehud Barak for years. Also, media doesn't like to talk about it, but Epstein made his money via ongoing and extensive blackmail enabled by his own surveillance systems in NY and on his ranch and private island, and of course there's that "above my pay grade" comment Alex Acosta made in regard to Epstein's non-prosecution in Florida in the early aughts, because "Epstein belonged to intelligence."
So yeah, the links are there. Your hypothesis is not proven, yet it's also anything but disproven, and the files themselves are full of countless things that people said couldn't actually be happening but were, so there it is. I'll keep it in mind going forward.
Also, please know that I didn't downvote you: I really wanted to know. I also didn't say "giant leap," I said "uphill climb" because it's not out of the range of possibility: if anything, the Epstein files prove that he had connections that also had connections that spanned the globe and every stratum of society. I genuinely wanted to understand, and now I do, at least more than I did. Thank you for answering me.