this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
370 points (99.7% liked)

politics

30124 readers
2505 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 70 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Summary for context:

Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime assistant said she personally arranged multiple phone calls between the disgraced pedophile financier and Donald Trump in the years before he became president.

[–] SwifferWetjet@thelemmy.club 13 points 1 week ago

Um, to tell him to stooooooop it. He's already said that.🙄

Genuinely unsure if I remember him saying he told him to stop and was the "one to turn him in," or if the substances I am using to cope with reality have finally warped it enough for me to remember days like shitty episodes from my favorite show.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

the disgraced pedophile financier and Donald Trump

They're gonna need to clarify better. That's like saying, "the bin full of garbage, and the trash can."

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When you're wondering about all that is still hidden, never forget this gem:

“Recall ive told you , i have met some very bad people , none as bad as trump. not one decent cell in his body”

That's Epstein -- with his own endless sordid secrets -- saying that about Trump.

[–] Iusedtobeanalien@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm convinced that Nicole Brown Simpson was killed by the Epstein network because through OJ she had found out what was happening and was disgusted and threatened to expose them.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I remember that whole thing pretty well: Nicole Brown Simpson was killed in the summer of 1994 and of course no one was talking about anything else for most of 1995, which was the arrest and trial. "If it fits, you must acquit," remember? These were the days of Windows 3.1 and 3.11, and I even had a screensaver of a little white Bronco very slowly being chased horizontally by a couple blinky blinky cop cars. It was good for a laugh.

But Epstein was not a part of that Hollywood set at all, as far as I ever knew. I could be wrong, but California was not really Epstein's world, Epstein was very busy with robbing Les Wexner blind in NY and Ohio at the time, and there was always more than enough history in regard to OJ's ongoing excessive, abusive behavior toward Nicole to explain why OJ did it, if he did it.

So when I read your comment, it seems a bit of an uphill climb, to be honest. Is there evidence that made you think that? I'd be interested in hearing it if you'd like to share.

[–] Iusedtobeanalien@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

OJ and Trump were best of friends, friends talk, partners talk. it's said that Nicole loathed trump. I don't think it's a giant leap to suggest OJ found out about those parties and it got around to his partner. Epstein was abusing children from the mid 80s, trump and OJ were best of friends in the early 90s. Is it unfeasible that trump said something to his friend and his friend then passed that on to his partner. I personally always operate under the assumption that if you are telling someone something secret you are telling their partner too, add to this Epstein operating a honey trap for one or more national security agencies then you have vested interests that would want to shut down any exposure and who have hitman and assassins on speed dial.

I don't see it as a huge leap.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

trump and OJ were best of friends in the early 90s

I did not remember this, so I looked it up. I had forgotten all about this, but you're right. Thick as thieves back in the day.

I personally always operate under the assumption that if you are telling someone something secret you are telling their partner too

Yeah, that's absolutely true regardless of any other factor.

add to this Epstein operating a honey trap for one or more national security agencies then you have vested interests that would want to shut down any exposure and who have hitman and assassins on speed dial.

Also proven, in my personal opinion, especially in regard to Israel. Epstein had ties to both Mossad and Ehud Barak for years. Also, media doesn't like to talk about it, but Epstein made his money via ongoing and extensive blackmail enabled by his own surveillance systems in NY and on his ranch and private island, and of course there's that "above my pay grade" comment Alex Acosta made in regard to Epstein's non-prosecution in Florida in the early aughts, because "Epstein belonged to intelligence."

So yeah, the links are there. Your hypothesis is not proven, yet it's also anything but disproven, and the files themselves are full of countless things that people said couldn't actually be happening but were, so there it is. I'll keep it in mind going forward.

Also, please know that I didn't downvote you: I really wanted to know. I also didn't say "giant leap," I said "uphill climb" because it's not out of the range of possibility: if anything, the Epstein files prove that he had connections that also had connections that spanned the globe and every stratum of society. I genuinely wanted to understand, and now I do, at least more than I did. Thank you for answering me.

[–] mgrecca2026@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I still don’t understand why Virginia Giuffre regards Trump as a gentleman

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

She doesn't regard anyone as anything anymore, we all know why

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 week ago

I tried finding Virginia saying that. I never could. This comes from her ghost writer, and if you read Virginias book, that just so conveniently was released after her death, you’ll notice it is written like ChatGPT wrote it. Every page just stinks of AI cliches.

So the woman isn’t here to discuss the book that just so happens to say nice things about Trump. Only her ghostwriter can speak for her. We don’t have Virginia here to say whether the way this book was written was her intent, or if anything had been added to it she didn’t say.

Aren't "gentlemen" just entitled assholes with inherited wealth?

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Nothing a march on Washington Albania style wouldn’t fix

[–] voidsignal@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

A shocker, really.