this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2026
772 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

85391 readers
5918 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 43 points 11 hours ago (6 children)

Good. Biological aging is nothing more than a series of processes, not an inherent property of atoms, and it's time we start getting serious about anti-aging and life extension.

But probably not, seeing what the world is like.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago

Only the rich will benefit.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Is it though? The only time progress happens is when people die.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 hours ago

People have been seeking life extension for all of recorded history.

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 39 points 11 hours ago (6 children)

Its mostly billionaires who will be able to benefit from life extension... do you really want a world where trump, musk, and all their silicon valley friends rule the world until they turn 300 years old?

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

No worries about that, there is no changing the maximum age seemingly, not unless you genetically engineered babies with tech we don't have yet.

Everyone is born with stem cells that carry so many copies of cells that are preprogrammed to die after a point to then be replaced by those stem cells. No drug can make more copies after the fact.

Then of course the dna gets denatured just by radiation and pollution and time.

Neither of these will or can be solved after someone is born. They can extend the average lifespan of a group, but they can't exceed the maximum, which has remained constant throughout human history even as the average has changed drastically.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

What's the maximum? About 120?

Imagine having 100 or more healthy years. That seems like sci-fi, but may be possible one day still.

It will also mean working until you're 100 before the national pension kicks in unfortunately lol

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 1 points 2 hours ago

National pension

Ngl, you had me in the first half...

[–] StenSaksTapir@feddit.dk 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Luckily there's no vaccine against guillotines.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago

Give it time.

Aroooooo

Billionaires, and everybody living outside the US

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

So essentially Altered Carbon?

I think that's more kinda digitised, transferable consciousness. I'd take it tho.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Why do you think that? We already benefit from life extension. And why only 300?

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

"I plan to live forever, of course, but barring that I'd settle for a couple thousand years. Even five hundred would be pretty nice."

CEO Nwabudike Morgan, "Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri" (1999)

[–] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

If you're that worried, start working towards killing them. Seems like it's going to be necessary step either way to correct many problems in the world. What's one more reason for the pyre?

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

How about not life extension but quality of life extension instead (e.g. this post)

[–] oce@jlai.lu 3 points 6 hours ago

Indeed, I don't really feel like living for more more than 90 years, I just want to be able to do what I like to do until I die.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't realize people weren't being serious about it this whole time. The tens of millions of dollars of research grants seemed pretty serious.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

LOL that pays for a focus group for branding. You can't be serious.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You're telling me you're a "huge nerd," but think medical research is done by companies and involves focus groups? Like, it's a Marvel or something?

Jfc. If 90 million dollars isn't anything to you, howbout you give yours away then bud.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, medicine is marketed. Are you for real? Like, is there still amniotic fluid behind your ears? Great Hatching Day fellow creature! Welcome to Earth!

My joke was that tens of millions of dollars to research aging barely covers the test tubes. JFC.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Bud, they don't market for a treatment before there's even research conducted. How the fuck are you acting like you think giant research grants are not effort? Give me ten million dollars if it isn't much then.