this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
143 points (66.8% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

3455 readers
563 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

Introduction to Socialism (external links)

Wiki

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Basic Course

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Advanced Course

Audiobooks Read by Dessalines

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I was willing to entertain that you might have been using a.i. as a crutch, but I'm not willing to have a full blown dialog with a.i. if you're just going to copy and paste it without thinking for yourself.

And my own radicalization didn’t come from the failure of a single candidate. It came from watching the cruelty and imperialist nature of the US play out over years. If that’s more commonly how radicalization happens, the grief cycle theory is betting on a mechanism that may not even be the primary driver.

Acknowledging the cruelty and imperialist nature of the US is the grief cycle. It's acceptance, the last stage. We were all raised to believe the US was something else. We had to grieve to arrive at acceptance that the US is not that. Similarly, there is a grief cycle to realize that voting can't change that.

Broken, traumatized, conditioned toward dominance, full of rage with no healthy outlet

That's being stuck in grief cycle, not completing it. Anger is the second stage. It's the stage we get stuck in when there are no healthy communities of grief to support us in our grieving. White men are isolated, by design, and thus become stuck in the anger stage. The path forward is support each other in moving past the anger stage.

And the system is very good at getting to those people before we are

No, it's not. The system is ALREADY AT THOSE PEOPLE before they even begin the process of anger. The system is fundamentally there at all times causing this. The solution is to build communities of healing and breaking down illusions that trap us, including revealing how the system works to trap us.

Increased suffering and violence

Is NOT what I'm advocating for. That's what accelerationism is. I am advocating for the demolition of illusions that protect people from grieving about the suffering and violence that is here.

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

And here I thought there was common ground, even sharing my own personal story a bit, trying to connect. And now I'm AI? I was a writer by trade. I'm certain my writing, along with millions of others, were used to train AI, most without our consent.

Meanwhile your structure and cadence shifted with your longer responses. So 🤷‍♂️

Yeah, I'm out. Anything I attempt to say now will just be claimed as "copy and paste."

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It doesn't seem weird to you that both of your last substantive comments started with the exact same concepts in the same structure and only slightly reworded?

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's called concessions dude. Argumentative structure. I steelman your argument, give it concessions where I do agree, and then follow up where I disagree and state my points. It leaves the reader on those points to let them settle.

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You don't think this is weird? Your second comment repeating your first comment even though my intervening comment didn't mention these things?

Are you saying you were just rewriting your comment and leaving in the stuff that didn't change? I've just never seen anyone in any forum do that before in 30 years.

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No, that's my own fault for copying and pasting the previous comment to rewrite the latter half and not editing the top half.

In all honesty, I was sitting on a roof taking a break while installing solar panels. That's my bad.

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

Sorry for accusing you of using a.i. I thought it was just regurgitating. I should assumed it was copy paste. My bad