this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
624 points (99.5% liked)

Off My Chest

1988 readers
3 users here now

RULES:


I am looking for mods!


1. The "good" part of our community means we are pro-empathy and anti-harassment. However, we don't intend to make this a "safe space" where everyone has to be a saint. Sh*t happens, and life is messy. That's why we get things off our chests.

2. Bigotry is not allowed. That includes racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia, and religiophobia. (If you want to vent about religion, that's fine; but religion is not inherently evil.)

3. Frustrated, venting, or angry posts are still welcome.

4. Posts and comments that bait, threaten, or incite harassment are not allowed.

5. If anyone offers mental, medical, or professional advice here, please remember to take it with a grain of salt. Seek out real professionals if needed.

6. Please put NSFW behind NSFW tags.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was terminated in retaliation for having a disability and being injured on the job due to my employer's negligence. I took leave for surgery due to that injury and was terminated the day I returned. The reason? Allegedly poor performance, despite my review, completed just three weeks before the beginning of my leave, stating I was doing fantastic. My manager pinned a number of her failures on me in the process, all of which I could prove were entirely due to her own incompetence, but HR had already fired me. No one cared.

I filed a complaint with my state's labor department, and in response my employer fabricated a host of lies to justify my termination. The department initially sided with them until I created a multi-page document explaining my evidence to them like they were a child. Within days, I had a new investigator and they had a team working on my case.

I just received a letter from the investigator. I won. Not only did they side with me for every accusation made by or against me, they found additional concerning details in my employer's story, entirely due to the evidence they fabricated. Poorly. So soooo poorly.

It was noticed that there was a significant uptick in terminations at the time, and more of them were of injured or disabled employees than could be accounted for by employee population composition. The state is now prosecuting them for their violations in my case and investigating the entire company for further violations.

Feels good.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not holding my breath but it would be nice if they went after specific individuals involved rather than just going after the corporation. Hell, even if the actual decision makers avoided leaving evidence, take out those who followed the orders to fabricate the reasoning. Hell, even the lawyers who presented the falsified claims should have some responsibility to verify them. Like defend your client with the truth but if you're just making shit up for their defense, that should have consequences.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I feel like you misunderstand what a defense attorney does... Like, yes, they aren't allowed to knowingly let a client perjure themselves, but also they have a responsibility to present the best case they can and not just go "yea, my client did it, one-hundo P. Lock 'em up."

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I get that but think perjury should extend beyond just what is said on the stand and should apply to the premise of the defense itself. Especially in the case of corporate lawyers. An investigation was able to determine the truth, that it had nothing to do with performance, so the lawyers that should have been even closer to the source should have also been able to figure that out. The lawyer's job should have been to tell them they can't fucking do that before it happened, not present a made up reality to mislead the investigation and hide what happened after the fact.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

There is no way the company runs every decision they make through the lawyers though. And what are they supposed to do when they get the filing in that case? Just agree and throw their client under the bus?

Like I get the sentiment, but the lawyers don't get 100% autonomy and control over the case. They can strongly suggest the client settle because they fucked up, but at the end of the day the client has to agree to that. If they don't, the lawyer has to go in front of the court and argue the best case they can.

Yea, some lawyers are snakes and will knowingly break the rules to try to win, and they should be held accountable for that. But I don't think they should be charged with the same crimes of their defendants every time they lose a case - no one would be a defense attorney.