Off My Chest
RULES:
I am looking for mods!
1. The "good" part of our community means we are pro-empathy and anti-harassment. However, we don't intend to make this a "safe space" where everyone has to be a saint. Sh*t happens, and life is messy. That's why we get things off our chests.
2. Bigotry is not allowed. That includes racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia, and religiophobia. (If you want to vent about religion, that's fine; but religion is not inherently evil.)
3. Frustrated, venting, or angry posts are still welcome.
4. Posts and comments that bait, threaten, or incite harassment are not allowed.
5. If anyone offers mental, medical, or professional advice here, please remember to take it with a grain of salt. Seek out real professionals if needed.
6. Please put NSFW behind NSFW tags.
view the rest of the comments
I feel like you misunderstand what a defense attorney does... Like, yes, they aren't allowed to knowingly let a client perjure themselves, but also they have a responsibility to present the best case they can and not just go "yea, my client did it, one-hundo P. Lock 'em up."
I get that but think perjury should extend beyond just what is said on the stand and should apply to the premise of the defense itself. Especially in the case of corporate lawyers. An investigation was able to determine the truth, that it had nothing to do with performance, so the lawyers that should have been even closer to the source should have also been able to figure that out. The lawyer's job should have been to tell them they can't fucking do that before it happened, not present a made up reality to mislead the investigation and hide what happened after the fact.
There is no way the company runs every decision they make through the lawyers though. And what are they supposed to do when they get the filing in that case? Just agree and throw their client under the bus?
Like I get the sentiment, but the lawyers don't get 100% autonomy and control over the case. They can strongly suggest the client settle because they fucked up, but at the end of the day the client has to agree to that. If they don't, the lawyer has to go in front of the court and argue the best case they can.
Yea, some lawyers are snakes and will knowingly break the rules to try to win, and they should be held accountable for that. But I don't think they should be charged with the same crimes of their defendants every time they lose a case - no one would be a defense attorney.